Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/2925
Title: Results of the randomized, placebo controlled clopidogrel and acetylsalicylic acid in bypass surgery for peripheal arterial disease (CASPAR) trial
Authors: Belch, Jill J.F.
Dormandy, John
Caspar Writing Committee
Issue Date: 2010
Publisher: Universidad de Valladolid. Facultad de Medicina
Description: Producción Científica
Citation: Journal of Vascular Surgery, October 2010, vol. 52, n.4. p.825-833
Abstract: Objective: Dual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel plus acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) is superior to ASA alone in patients with acute coronary syndromes and in those undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. We sought to determine whether clopidogrel plus ASA conferred benefit on limb outcomes over ASA alone in patients undergoing below-knee bypass grafting. Methods: Patients undergoing unilateral, below-knee bypass graft for atherosclerotic peripheral arterial disease (PAD) were enrolled 2 to 4 days after surgery and were randomly assigned to clopidogrel 75 mg/day plus ASA 75 to 100 mg/day or placebo plus ASA 75 to 100 mg/day for 6 to 24 months. The primary efficacy endpoint was a composite of index-graft occlusion or revascularization, above-ankle amputation of the affected limb, or death. The primary safety endpoint was severe bleeding (Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue plasminogen activator for Occluded coronary arteries [GUSTO] classification). Results: In the overall population, the primary endpoint occurred in 149 of 425 patients in the clopidogrel group vs 151 of 426 patients in the placebo (plus ASA) group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.98; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.78-1.23). In a prespecified subgroup analysis, the primary endpoint was significantly reduced by clopidogrel in prosthetic graft patients (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.45-0.95; P .025) but not in venous graft patients (HR, 1.25; 95% CI, 0.94-1.67, not significant [NS]). A significant statistical interaction between treatment effect and graft type was observed (Pinteraction .008). Although total bleeds were more frequent with clopidogrel, there was no significant difference between the rates of severe bleeding in the clopidogrel and placebo (plus ASA) groups (2.1% vs 1.2%). Conclusion: The combination of clopidogrel plus ASA did not improve limb or systemic outcomes in the overall population of PAD patients requiring below-knee bypass grafting. Subgroup analysis suggests that clopidogrel plus ASA confers benefit in patients receiving prosthetic grafts without significantly increasing major bleeding risk.
Keywords: Cardiovascular, aparato, efectos de los medicamentos sobre el
Cirugía cardiovascular
ISSN: 0741-5214
Peer Review: SI
Language: spa
URI: http://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/2925
Rights: info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Appears in Collections:DEP11 - Artículos de revista

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
vaquero10.pdfPD-10460,13 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open

This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Suggestions
University of Valladolid
Powered by MIT's. DSpace software, Version 5.5
UVa-STIC