Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Peer effects in judicial decisions: Evidence from Spanish labour courts
Authors: Martín Román, Ángel Luis
Moral de Blas, Alfonso
Martínez Matute, Marta
Issue Date: 2015
Publisher: Elsevier
Citation: International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 20-37.
Abstract: The aim of this paper is to estimate peer effects in judicial decisions by exploring whether local and/or regional patterns may impact these decisions. The analysis of these patterns allows us to detect the existence of different social or neighbourhood effects, namely, contextual, correlated and peer effects. Our empirical analysis is based on the General Council of the Judiciary database, which provides court level information on the number of cases resolved in favour of the worker by judges between 2004 and 2010. Methodologically, we build different spatial correlation matrices to find local and/or regional patterns. Underlying the current analysis is the notion that judges might be influenced by the decisions taken by their colleagues in neighbouring provincial or even regional courts. Our results point to the absence of contextual effects, some significance of correlated effects (likely caused by the existence of a High Court in each region that acts as the highest authority before which appeals may be filed) and strong evidence of peer effects.
Peer Review: SI
DOI: 10.1016/j.irle.2014.12.001
Sponsor: Spanish Government projects ECO2014-52343-P and CSO2015-69439-R
Publisher Version:
Rights Owner: Elsevier
Language: eng
Rights: info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
Appears in Collections:DEP34 - Artículos de revista

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
MANUSCRIPT.pdf206,92 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail

This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

University of Valladolid
Powered by MIT's. DSpace software, Version 5.5