Dialogus de oratoribus versus Institutio oratoria

Título

dc.contributor.author	Alberte González, Antonio
dc.contributor.editor	Ediciones Universidad de Valladolid	es
dc.date.accessioned	2019-04-24T17:52:41Z
dc.date.available	2019-04-24T17:52:41Z
dc.date.issued	1993
dc.identifier.citation	Minerva. Revista de Filología Clásica; Núm. 7 (1993) pags. 255-267
dc.identifier.issn	2530-6480
dc.identifier.uri	http://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/35384
dc.description.abstract	The writer of this article purports to prove that Mesala's participation in the Dialogus de oratoribus is not only a cristicism of the school of rhetoric upheld by Quintilian but it is also a correction of Quintilian's distorted version of Cicero's opinion.
dc.format.mimetype	application/pdf
dc.language.iso	spa
dc.rights.accessRights	info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.uri	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.source	Minerva. Revista de Filología Clásica
dc.subject	Filología clásica
dc.title	Dialogus de oratoribus versus Institutio oratoria
dc.type	info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.relation.publisherversion	https://revistas.uva.es/index.php/minerva/article/view/3164
dc.identifier.publicationfirstpage	255
dc.identifier.publicationissue	7
dc.identifier.publicationlastpage	267
dc.rights	Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.type.hasVersion	info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion