Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAlberte González, Antonio
dc.contributor.editorEdiciones Universidad de Valladolid
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-24T17:52:41Z
dc.date.available2019-04-24T17:52:41Z
dc.date.issued1993
dc.identifier.citationMinerva. Revista de Filología Clásica; Núm. 7 (1993) pags. 255-267
dc.identifier.issn2530-6480
dc.identifier.urihttp://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/35384
dc.description.abstractThe writer of this article purports to prove that Mesala's participation in the Dialogus de oratoribus is not only a cristicism of the school of rhetoric upheld by Quintilian but it is also a correction of Quintilian's distorted version of Cicero's opinion.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isospa
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.sourceMinerva. Revista de Filología Clásica
dc.subjectFilología clásica
dc.titleDialogus de oratoribus versus Institutio oratoria
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://revistas.uva.es/index.php/minerva/article/view/3164
dc.identifier.publicationfirstpage255
dc.identifier.publicationissue7
dc.identifier.publicationlastpage267
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/submittedVersion


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record