Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorLlamazares Rodríguez, Bonifacio 
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-08T06:14:28Z
dc.date.available2019-06-08T06:14:28Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.citationReview of Economic Design, 2013, vol. 17, n. 3, p. 239-248.es
dc.identifier.issn1434-4742es
dc.identifier.urihttp://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/36226
dc.descriptionProducción Científicaes
dc.description.abstractVoting systems between two alternatives have been widely studied in the literature of Social Choice. One of the results given by Fishburn (The Theory of Social Choice. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1973) allows us to characterize anonymous, neutral and monotonic voting systems by means of functions satisfying adequate conditions. From among all kinds of functions, the class of affine functions is highly interesting because from them it is possible to obtain the voting systems most used in practice. In this paper we analyze the structure of the set of these functions and we show that this set is convex and its extreme points are the functions that generate the following voting systems: simple majority, absolute majority, unanimous majority and Pareto majority. Moreover, we suggest a simple method for choosing a voting system when two alternatives are under consideration.es
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfes
dc.language.isoenges
dc.publisherSpringeres
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccesses
dc.subject.classificationVoting systemses
dc.titleOn the structure of voting systems between two alternativeses
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees
dc.rights.holderSpringeres
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10058-013-0146-xes
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10058-013-0146-xes
dc.peerreviewedSIes
dc.description.projectMinistry of Economy and Competitiveness (Project ECO2012-32178) and ERDFes


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem