• español
  • English
  • français
  • Deutsch
  • português (Brasil)
  • italiano
    • español
    • English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • português (Brasil)
    • italiano
    • español
    • English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • português (Brasil)
    • italiano
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Parcourir

    Tout UVaDOCCommunautésPar date de publicationAuteursSujetsTitres

    Mon compte

    Ouvrir une session

    Statistiques

    Statistiques d'usage de visualisation

    Compartir

    Voir le document 
    •   Accueil de UVaDOC
    • PUBLICATIONS SCIENTIFIQUES
    • Departamentos
    • Dpto. Economía Aplicada
    • DEP20 - Artículos de revista
    • Voir le document
    •   Accueil de UVaDOC
    • PUBLICATIONS SCIENTIFIQUES
    • Departamentos
    • Dpto. Economía Aplicada
    • DEP20 - Artículos de revista
    • Voir le document
    • español
    • English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • português (Brasil)
    • italiano

    Exportar

    RISMendeleyRefworksZotero
    • edm
    • marc
    • xoai
    • qdc
    • ore
    • ese
    • dim
    • uketd_dc
    • oai_dc
    • etdms
    • rdf
    • mods
    • mets
    • didl
    • premis

    Citas

    Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem:http://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/22888

    Título
    Probabilities of consistent election outcomes with majorities based on difference in support
    Autor
    Diss, Mostapha
    Pérez Asurmendi, Patrizia
    Año del Documento
    2016
    Editorial
    INFORMS (Institute for Operations Research and Management Sciences)
    Descripción
    Producción Científica
    Documento Fuente
    Group Decision and Negotiation, 2016, 25, p. 967-994
    Résumé
    Computer simulations are used to evaluate the likelihood of consistent outcomes under the class of majorities based on diference in support. These majorities require certain consensus in collective preferences to declare an alternative as the winner. More precisely, individuals show preference intensities in the unit interval among each pair of alternatives and it is required that the winner alternative obtains a diference in the sum of the intensities with respect to the loser alternative. This diference is a real number located between 0 and the total number of voters. We introduce the values of the required threshold for which majorities based on diference in support lead to transitive and triple-acyclic collective decisions with a probability of 1. Ourresults improve the previous theoretical ones since they require softer thresholds to reach consistent collective decisions.
    Palabras Clave
    Simulaciones por ordenador
    ISSN
    0926-2644
    Revisión por pares
    SI
    DOI
    10.1007/s10726-015-9467-1
    Patrocinador
    Ministerio de Economía, Industria y Competitividad (Project ECO2012-32178)
    Ministerio de Economía, Industria y Competitividad (Project ECO2012-34202)
    Version del Editor
    http://rd.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10726-015-9467-1
    Propietario de los Derechos
    © Springer
    Idioma
    eng
    URI
    http://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/22888
    Derechos
    openAccess
    Aparece en las colecciones
    • DEP20 - Artículos de revista [183]
    Afficher la notice complète
    Fichier(s) constituant ce document
    Nombre:
    reviewgdn16.pdf
    Tamaño:
    310.8Ko
    Formato:
    Adobe PDF
    Thumbnail
    Voir/Ouvrir
    Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 InternationalExcepté là où spécifié autrement, la license de ce document est décrite en tant que Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International

    Universidad de Valladolid

    Powered by MIT's. DSpace software, Version 5.10