Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
dc.contributor.author | Llamazares Rodríguez, Bonifacio | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-06-08T05:58:21Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-06-08T05:58:21Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2017, vol. 110, p. 109-113. | es |
dc.identifier.issn | 0360-8352 | es |
dc.identifier.uri | http://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/36225 | |
dc.description | Producción Científica | es |
dc.description.abstract | There exist in the literature several models to tackle the problem of aggregating preferences rankings where each alternative is evaluated with the most favorable scoring vector for it (which can be considered as an optimistic approach). Recently, Khodabakhshi and Aryavash (2015) have suggested a new model where both the optimistic and the pessimistic approaches are taken into account. In this paper we provide closed-form expressions for the scores of alternatives when the model proposed by these authors is used. The expressions obtained allow us to analyze the model and suggest some small modifications. | es |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | es |
dc.language.iso | eng | es |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | es |
dc.rights.accessRights | info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess | es |
dc.subject.classification | Aggregating preference rankings | es |
dc.subject.classification | Data Envelopment Analysis | es |
dc.subject.classification | Scoring rules | es |
dc.title | Aggregating preference rankings using an optimistic-pessimistic approach: Closed-form expressions | es |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | es |
dc.rights.holder | Elsevier | es |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.cie.2017.05.035 | es |
dc.relation.publisherversion | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2017.05.035 | es |
dc.peerreviewed | SI | es |
dc.description.project | Ministerio español de Economía y Competitividad (Project ECO2016-77900-P) and FEDER | es |
dc.description.project | Junta de Castilla y León (Consejería de Educación, Project VA066U13) | es |