• español
  • English
  • français
  • Deutsch
  • português (Brasil)
  • italiano
    • español
    • English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • português (Brasil)
    • italiano
    • español
    • English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • português (Brasil)
    • italiano
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Parcourir

    Tout UVaDOCCommunautésPar date de publicationAuteursSujetsTitres

    Mon compte

    Ouvrir une session

    Statistiques

    Statistiques d'usage de visualisation

    Compartir

    Voir le document 
    •   Accueil de UVaDOC
    • PUBLICATIONS SCIENTIFIQUES
    • Departamentos
    • Dpto. Economía Aplicada
    • DEP20 - Artículos de revista
    • Voir le document
    •   Accueil de UVaDOC
    • PUBLICATIONS SCIENTIFIQUES
    • Departamentos
    • Dpto. Economía Aplicada
    • DEP20 - Artículos de revista
    • Voir le document
    • español
    • English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • português (Brasil)
    • italiano

    Exportar

    RISMendeleyRefworksZotero
    • edm
    • marc
    • xoai
    • qdc
    • ore
    • ese
    • dim
    • uketd_dc
    • oai_dc
    • etdms
    • rdf
    • mods
    • mets
    • didl
    • premis

    Citas

    Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem:http://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/40527

    Título
    Electoral Mathematics and Asymmetrical Treatment to Political Parties: The Mexican Case
    Autor
    Martínez Panero, MiguelAutoridad UVA Orcid
    Año del Documento
    2017
    Documento Fuente
    International Journal of Social, Behavioral, Educational, Economic, Business and Industrial Engineering 11, pp. 214-222, 2017
    Résumé
    The Mexican Chamber of Deputies is composed of 500 representatives: 300 of them elected by relative majority and another 200 ones elected through proportional representation in five electoral clusters (constituencies) with 40 representatives each. In this mixed-member electoral system, the seats distribution of proportional representation is not independent of the election by relative majority, as it attempts to correct representation imbalances produced in single-member districts. This two-fold structure has been maintained in the successive electoral reforms carried out along the last three decades (eight from 1986 to 2014). In all of them, the election process of 200 seats becomes complex: Formulas in the Law are difficult to understand and to be interpreted. This paper analyzes the Mexican electoral system after the electoral reform of 2014, which was applied for the first time in 2015. The research focuses on contradictions and issues of applicability, in particular situations where seats allocation is affected by ambiguity in the law and where asymmetrical treatment of political parties arises. Due to these facts, a proposal of electoral reform will be presented. It is intended to be simpler, clearer, and more enduring than the current system. Furthermore, this model is more suitable for producing electoral outcomes free of contradictions and paradoxes. This approach would allow a fair treatment of political parties and as a result an improved opportunity to exercise democracy.
    Revisión por pares
    SI
    DOI
    10.5281/zenodo.1340054
    Idioma
    spa
    URI
    http://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/40527
    Tipo de versión
    info:eu-repo/semantics/draft
    Derechos
    openAccess
    Aparece en las colecciones
    • DEP20 - Artículos de revista [183]
    Afficher la notice complète
    Fichier(s) constituant ce document
    Nombre:
    Electoral-Mathematics-and-Asymmetrical-Treatment-to-Political-Parties-The-Mexican-Case.pdf
    Tamaño:
    220.4Ko
    Formato:
    Adobe PDF
    Thumbnail
    Voir/Ouvrir
    CC0 1.0 UniversalExcepté là où spécifié autrement, la license de ce document est décrite en tant que CC0 1.0 Universal

    Universidad de Valladolid

    Powered by MIT's. DSpace software, Version 5.10