Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorAdler, Marcel
dc.contributor.authorHerrera Gómez, Francisco Magno
dc.contributor.authorMartín García, Débora 
dc.contributor.authorGavid, Marie
dc.contributor.authorÁlvarez González, Francisco Javier 
dc.contributor.authorOchoa Sangrador, Carlos
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-16T08:33:53Z
dc.date.available2021-03-16T08:33:53Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationPharmaceuticals, 2020, vol. 13, n. 5. 10 p.es
dc.identifier.issn1424-8247es
dc.identifier.urihttp://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/45759
dc.descriptionProducción Científicaes
dc.description.abstractAfter relative erythropoietin deficiency, iron deficiency is the second most important contributing factor for anemia in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. Iron supplementation is a crucial part of the treatment of anemia in CKD patients, and intravenous (IV) iron supplementation is considered to be superior to per os (PO) iron supplementation. The differences between the available formulations are poorly characterized. This report presents results from pairwise and network meta-analyses carried out after a comprehensive search in sources of published and unpublished studies, according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) recommendations (International prospective register of systematic reviews PROSPERO reference ID: CRD42020148155). Meta-analytic calculations were performed for the outcome of non-response to iron supplementation (i.e., hemoglobin (Hgb) increase of <0.5–1.0 g/dL, or initiation/intensification of erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) therapy, or increase/change of iron supplement, or requirements of blood transfusion). A total of 34 randomized controlled trials (RCT) were identified, providing numerical data for analyses covering 93.7% (n = 10.097) of the total study population. At the network level, iron supplementation seems to have a more protective effect against the outcome of non-response before the start of dialysis than once dialysis is initiated, and some preparations seem to be more potent (e.g., ferumoxytol, ferric carboxymaltose), compared to the rest of iron supplements assessed (surface under the cumulative ranking area (SUCRA) > 0.8). This study provides parameters for adequately following-up patients requiring iron supplementation, by presenting the most performing preparations, and, indirectly, by making it possible to identify good responders among all patients treated with these medicines.es
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfes
dc.language.isoenges
dc.publisherMDPIes
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subject.classificationAnemiaes
dc.subject.classificationIron deficiencyes
dc.subject.classificationDéficit de hierroes
dc.subject.classificationIron compoundses
dc.subject.classificationCompuestos de hierroes
dc.subject.classificationKidney Diseaseses
dc.subject.classificationEnfermedades renaleses
dc.titleThe impact of iron supplementation for treating anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease: Results from pairwise and network meta-analyses of randomized controlled trialses
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees
dc.rights.holder© 2020 MDPIes
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/ph13050085es
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.mdpi.com/1424-8247/13/5/85es
dc.peerreviewedSIes
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem