Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorLebrero Fernández, Raquel 
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez Rodríguez, Elisa
dc.contributor.authorCollantes, María
dc.contributor.authorDe Juan, Carlos
dc.contributor.authorNorden, Geir
dc.contributor.authorRosenbom, Kim
dc.contributor.authorMuñoz Torre, Raúl 
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-19T08:18:26Z
dc.date.available2023-05-19T08:18:26Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationApplied Sciences, 2021, Vol. 11, Nº. 7, 2966es
dc.identifier.issn2076-3417es
dc.identifier.urihttps://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/59646
dc.descriptionProducción Científicaes
dc.description.abstractPacking materials used in biofiltration of gaseous pollutants represent a key design parameter, as a proper selection might not only determine the adequate performance of the system but also its cost-effectiveness. This study systematically assessed and compared the performance of a conventional plastic carrier with that of two novel clay-based materials from SAINT GOBAIN for the abatement of a model odorous stream composed of H2S, methylmercaptan and toluene. The packing materials were tested in biotrickling filters, biofilters and a two-phase biotrickling filter. SAINT GOBAIN materials exhibited a higher adsorption potential under abiotic conditions, a higher buffer capacity and a superior performance compared to conventional plastic rings when implemented in biotrickling filters operating at gas residence times as low as 7.5 s. Among the materials tested in biofilters, Filtralite Air AC supported almost complete H2S and toluene removals at a gas residence time of 20 s, while successfully eliminating methylmercaptan at values of ~80%. Interestingly, under most of the conditions tested, clay-based materials also showed comparable pressure drop values than those of plastic rings.es
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfes
dc.language.isoenges
dc.publisherMDPIes
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectAir - Purification - Technological innovationses
dc.subjectAire - Contaminaciónes
dc.subjectOdorses
dc.subjectOdor controles
dc.subjectImpacto ambientales
dc.subjectAir pollution
dc.subject.classificationPacking materiales
dc.subject.classificationTwo-phase biotrickling filteres
dc.titleComparative performance evaluation of commercial packing materials for malodorants abatement in biofiltrationes
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees
dc.rights.holder© 2021 The authorses
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/app11072966es
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/7/2966es
dc.identifier.publicationfirstpage2966es
dc.identifier.publicationissue7es
dc.identifier.publicationtitleApplied Scienceses
dc.identifier.publicationvolume11es
dc.peerreviewedSIes
dc.description.projectJunta de Castilla y León - (grant CLU 2017-09)es
dc.identifier.essn2076-3417es
dc.rightsAtribución 4.0 Internacional*
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones
dc.subject.unesco3303 Ingeniería y Tecnología Químicases
dc.subject.unesco3308 Ingeniería y Tecnología del Medio Ambientees


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem