Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorGarcía García, Sergio
dc.contributor.authorGarcía Galindo, Manuel
dc.contributor.authorArrese, Ignacio
dc.contributor.authorSarabia Herrero, María Rosario 
dc.contributor.authorCepeda, Santiago
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-13T11:32:56Z
dc.date.available2023-07-13T11:32:56Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationMedicina, 2022, Vol. 58, Nº. 12, 1746es
dc.identifier.issn1648-9144es
dc.identifier.urihttps://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/60271
dc.descriptionProducción Científicaes
dc.description.abstractBackground and Objectives: Survival estimation for patients diagnosed with Glioblastoma (GBM) is an important information to consider in patient management and communication. Despite some known risk factors, survival estimation remains a major challenge. Novel non-invasive technologies such as radiomics and artificial intelligence (AI) have been implemented to increase the accuracy of these predictions. In this article, we reviewed and discussed the most significant available research on survival estimation for GBM through advanced non-invasive methods. Materials and Methods: PubMed database was queried for articles reporting on survival prognosis for GBM through advanced image and data management methods. Articles including in their title or abstract the following terms were initially screened: ((glioma) AND (survival)) AND ((artificial intelligence) OR (radiomics)). Exclusively English full-text articles, reporting on humans, published as of 1 September 2022 were considered. Articles not reporting on overall survival, evaluating the effects of new therapies or including other tumors were excluded. Research with a radiomics-based methodology were evaluated using the radiomics quality score (RQS). Results: 382 articles were identified. After applying the inclusion criteria, 46 articles remained for further analysis. These articles were thoroughly assessed, summarized and discussed. The results of the RQS revealed some of the limitations of current radiomics investigation on this field. Limitations of analyzed studies included data availability, patient selection and heterogeneity of methodologies. Future challenges on this field are increasing data availability, improving the general understanding of how AI handles data and establishing solid correlations between image features and tumor’s biology. Conclusions: Radiomics and AI methods of data processing offer a new paradigm of possibilities to tackle the question of survival prognosis in GBM.es
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfes
dc.language.isoenges
dc.publisherMDPIes
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectOncologyes
dc.subjectCancer Researches
dc.subjectNeuroscienceses
dc.subjectSurvivales
dc.subjectSupervivenciaes
dc.subjectArtificial intelligencees
dc.subjectMachine learninges
dc.subjectAprendizaje automáticoes
dc.subject.classificationGlioblastomaes
dc.subject.classificationGliomaes
dc.titleCurrent evidence, limitations and future challenges of survival prediction for glioblastoma based on advanced noninvasive methods: A narrative reviewes
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees
dc.rights.holder© 2022 The Authorses
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/medicina58121746es
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.mdpi.com/1648-9144/58/12/1746es
dc.identifier.publicationfirstpage1746es
dc.identifier.publicationissue12es
dc.identifier.publicationtitleMedicinaes
dc.identifier.publicationvolume58es
dc.peerreviewedSIes
dc.identifier.essn1648-9144es
dc.rightsAtribución 4.0 Internacional*
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones
dc.subject.unesco3207.13 Oncologíaes
dc.subject.unesco1203.04 Inteligencia Artificiales


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem