Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorMasoumi, Maryam
dc.contributor.authorDurán Barroso, Ramón José 
dc.contributor.authorRuiz Pérez, Lidia 
dc.contributor.authorBrasca, Fabrizio
dc.contributor.authorRizzi, Gianluca
dc.contributor.authorMerayo Álvarez, Noemí 
dc.contributor.authorAguado Manzano, Juan Carlos 
dc.contributor.authorFernández Reguero, Patricia 
dc.contributor.authorLorenzo Toledo, Rubén Mateo 
dc.contributor.authorAbril Domingo, Evaristo José 
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-26T08:00:06Z
dc.date.available2023-10-26T08:00:06Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citation2022 32nd International Telecommunication Networks and Applications Conference (ITNAC), Wellington, New Zealand, 2022, pp. 1-6es
dc.identifier.urihttps://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/62354
dc.descriptionProducción Científicaes
dc.description.abstractThe Multi-access Edge Computing (MEC) architecture is made up of geographically distributed edge servers so that computing capabilities are provisioned at the network edge, close to the end users. Network Function Virtualization (NFV), when combined with MEC, provides network services in the form of Service Function Chains (SFC) with low latency. In the design of NFV-based 5G networks, the trade-off between the cost of resource deployment and the effective provisioning of services must be considered. In this work, we analyze the impact of having different MEC locations when considering the provision of SFCs in a dynamic scenario (and thus also address VNF placement). In order to deal with infrastructure failures, it is of great importance to employ robust and resilient network strategies. To safeguard SFCs against failures, various protection techniques can be applied. We use two protection methods, namely, dedicated VNF protection and shared VNF protection, under the assumption of single network failures. The operational performances of different approaches are evaluated in terms of blocking ratio and end-to-end delay, both for the whole network and for different services, and we analyze whether it is better to distribute computing servers among a few MEC sites or among a higher number.es
dc.format.extent6 p.es
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfes
dc.language.isoenges
dc.publisherInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)es
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subject.classificationNFVes
dc.subject.classificationMECes
dc.subject.classificationVNF Placementes
dc.subject.classificationProtectiones
dc.titleDynamic Online VNF Placement with Different Protection Schemes in a MEC Environmentes
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObjectes
dc.identifier.doi10.1109/ITNAC55475.2022.9998347es
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9998347es
dc.title.event2022 32nd International Telecommunication Networks and Applications Conference (ITNAC)es
dc.description.projectEU H2020 MSCA ITN-ETN IoTalentum (grant no. 953442)es
dc.description.projectConsejería de Educación de la Junta de Castilla y León y FEDER (VA231P20)es
dc.description.projectMinisterio de Ciencia e Innovación y Agencia Estatal de Investigación (Proyecto PID2020-112675RB-C42 financiado por MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033)es
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersiones


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem