Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorCarrasco Uribarren, Andoni
dc.contributor.authorMarimon, Xavier
dc.contributor.authorDantony, Flora
dc.contributor.authorCabanillas Barea, Sara
dc.contributor.authorPortela, Alejandro
dc.contributor.authorCeballos Laita, Luis 
dc.contributor.authorMassip Álvarez, Albert
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-21T09:25:03Z
dc.date.available2023-12-21T09:25:03Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationApplied Sciences, 2023, Vol. 13, Nº. 6, 3910es
dc.identifier.issn2076-3417es
dc.identifier.urihttps://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/63749
dc.descriptionProducción Científicaes
dc.description.abstractAs its name implies, the forward head position (FHP) is when the head is further forward of the trunk than normal. This can cause neck and shoulder tension, as well as headaches. The craniovertebral angle (CVA) measured with 2D systems such as Kinovea software is often used to assess the FHP. Computer vision applications have proven to be reliable in different areas of daily life. The aim of this study is to analyze the test-retest and inter-rater reliability and the concurrent validity of a smartphone application based on computer vision for the measurement of the CVA. Methods: The CVAs of fourteen healthy volunteers, fourteen neck pain patients, and fourteen tension-type headache patients were assessed. The assessment was carried out twice, with a week of rest between sessions. Each examiner took a lateral photo in a standing position with the smartphone app based on computer vision. The test-retest reliability was calculated with the assessment of the CVA measured by the smartphone application, and the inter-rater reliability was also calculated. A third examiner assessed the CVA using 2D Kinovea software to calculate its concurrent validity. Results: The CVA in healthy volunteers was 54.65 (7.00); in patients with neck pain, 57.67 (5.72); and in patients with tension-type headaches, 54.63 (6.48). The test-retest reliability was excellent, showing an Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) of 0.92 (0.86–0.95) for the whole sample. The inter-rater reliability was excellent, with an ICC of 0.91 (0.84–0.95) for the whole sample. The standard error of the measurement with the app was stated as 1.83°, and the minimum detectable change was stated as 5.07°. The concurrent validity was high: r = 0.94, p < 0.001. Conclusion: The computer-based smartphone app showed excellent test-retest and inter-rater reliability and strong concurrent validity compared to Kinovea software for the measurement of CVA.es
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfes
dc.language.isoenges
dc.publisherMDPIes
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectNeckes
dc.subjectCuello - Enfermedadeses
dc.subjectKinematicses
dc.subjectCinemáticaes
dc.subjectComputer visiones
dc.subjectVisión artificial (Robótica)es
dc.subjectRoboticses
dc.subjectMedical technologyes
dc.subjectMaterials sciencees
dc.subjectCiencia de los materialeses
dc.titleA computer vision-based application for the assessment of head posture: A validation and reliability studyes
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees
dc.rights.holder© 2023 The authorses
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/app13063910es
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/13/6/3910es
dc.identifier.publicationfirstpage3910es
dc.identifier.publicationissue6es
dc.identifier.publicationtitleApplied Scienceses
dc.identifier.publicationvolume13es
dc.peerreviewedSIes
dc.identifier.essn2076-3417es
dc.rightsAtribución 4.0 Internacional*
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones
dc.subject.unesco32 Ciencias Médicases
dc.subject.unesco3213.11 Fisioterapiaes
dc.subject.unesco1203.17 Informáticaes
dc.subject.unesco3314 Tecnología Médicaes


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem