Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem:https://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/64353
Título
EVO+ Implantable Collamer Lens KS-aquaPORT Location, Stability, and Impact on Quality of Vision and Life
Autor
Año del Documento
2022
Documento Fuente
J Refract Surg. 2022, vol. 38, n. 3. p. 177-183.
Abstract
Purpose: To determine the longitudinal variation in the KS-aquaPORT central hole location of the phakic EVO+I Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL) (STAAR Surgical) and analyze its influence on visual performance, quality of vision (QoV), and quality of life (QoL).
Methods: A prospective study was performed including 36 patients who had EVO+ ICL implantation. The KS-aquaPORT central hole location (Cartesian and polar coordinates) was determined with respect to the pupil center and visual axis. The effect of time (6-month follow-up) on central hole location was analyzed using linear mixed models. The effect of the KS-aquaPORT location on visual performance, QoV, and QoL parameters was assessed with multivariate regression models.
Results: With respect to the visual axis, no significant changes in KS-aquaPORT location were found during follow-up. With respect to the pupil center, the X-coordinate and radius of KS-aquaPORT location showed modest, but significant (P ≤ .05) differences between 1-week and 3-month postoperative visits, and between 1-week and 6-month visits. X-coordinate variation was significant (P = .022) between 1-and 6-month visits. With respect to the visual axis, greater KS-aquaPORT decentration was associated with worse visual acuity (X-coordinate: P = .004; radius: P = .006), and inferior decentration with longer xenon-type glare photostress recovery time (P = .021). With respect to the pupil center, a lower radius was associated with better QoV scores (P ≤ .01) and temporal decentration produced higher ring-shaped dysphotopsia (P = .007).
Conclusions: EVO+ ICL KS-aquaPORT location appears to be clinically stable up to 6 months postoperatively. A central location of the EVO+ ICL KS-aquaPORT hole is preferred because it allows reduced perception of dysphotopic phenomena that can result in better QoV.
ISSN
1081-597X
Revisión por pares
SI
Patrocinador
This study was supported in part by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (Instituto de Salud Carlos III) through Research Projects RETICS RD16/008/0001 (Oftared); EM-P was supported by Junta de Castilla y León and European Social Fund (EDU/1100/2017).
Version del Editor
Propietario de los Derechos
Journal of Refractive Surgery
Idioma
eng
Tipo de versión
info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
Derechos
restrictedAccess
Aparece en las colecciones
Files in questo item
Tamaño:
999.2Kb
Formato:
Adobe PDF