Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorMartínez Plaza, Elena 
dc.contributor.authorLópez Miguel, Alberto 
dc.contributor.authorFernández, Itziar
dc.contributor.authorBlázquez Araúzo, Francisco
dc.contributor.authorMaldonado, Miguel J.
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-10T15:58:30Z
dc.date.available2024-01-10T15:58:30Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationJ Cataract Refract Surg. 2019, vol. 45, n. 11. p. 1591-1596.es
dc.identifier.issn0886-3350es
dc.identifier.urihttps://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/64384
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To analyze the effect of the central hole location in the V4c implantable collamer lens (ICL) on the quality of vision, including progressive headlight glare simulation and quality of life. Setting: IOBA-Eye Institute, Valladolid, Spain. Design: Case series. Methods: The central hole location was determined by slitlamp and dual Scheimpflug imaging for 6 months or more postoperatively. The visual acuity, mesopic contrast sensitivity, halogen glare contrast sensitivity, xenon glare contrast sensitivity, photostress recovery time after glare, de Boer scale, and Quality of Life Impact of Refractive Correction (QIRC) questionnaire results were evaluated. Multiple regression models were used to analyze the effect of the central hole location on parameters using the pupil center and visual axis as references based on Cartesian and polar coordinates. Results: The safety index was 1.13 and the efficacy index, 1.12. Under all testing circumstances, central hole decentration did not affect the visual acuity or contrast sensitivity. With the visual axis as a reference, worse QIRC values were associated with greater upward central hole displacement (P = .03) and a lower polar angle value (P = .008); also, halogen glare discomfort was greater with a higher radius (P = .04). Using the pupil center as a reference, greater nasal central hole decentration was associated with longer xenon glare photostress recovery time (P = .002). Conclusions: Implantation of the ICL with a central hole yielded excellent visual outcomes, even under increasing glare sources, regardless of the hole's location. However, hole decentration might affect patient-perceived quality of life, bothersome halogen glare, and longer xenon glare photostress recovery time. Such complaints after the early postoperative period might be managed with discrete ICL centration if the central hole is decentered upward or nasally.es
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfes
dc.language.isoenges
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccesses
dc.titleEffect of central hole location in phakic intraocular lenses on visual function under progressive headlight glare sourceses
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees
dc.rights.holderJournal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery - Elsevier Science Inc.es
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jcrs.2019.06.022es
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2019.06.022es
dc.identifier.publicationfirstpage1591es
dc.identifier.publicationissue11es
dc.identifier.publicationlastpage1596es
dc.identifier.publicationtitleJournal of Cataract and Refractive Surgeryes
dc.identifier.publicationvolume45es
dc.peerreviewedSIes
dc.description.projectThis study was supported in part by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (Instituto de Salud Carlos III) through Research Projects RETICS RD16/008/0001 (Oftared); EM-P was supported by Junta de Castilla y León and European Social Fund (EDU/1100/2017).es
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/submittedVersiones


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem