dc.contributor.author | Sánchez Yustos, Policarpo | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-01-23T09:50:43Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-01-23T09:50:43Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Quaternary International 526 (2019) 67–76 | es |
dc.identifier.uri | https://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/64865 | |
dc.description.abstract | The Oldowan-Acheulean transition shows remarkable variability in Olduvai Bed II. To explain this, M. Leakey
formulated a cultural model whose most distinctive contribution was the introduction of two cultural traditions
(Developed Oldowan A and B) between the Oldowan and the Acheulean. This model has been discussed for the
last fifty years, giving rise to the “Developed Oldowan B debate”. SHK is one of the very few sites that M. Leakey
employed to characterize this cultural tradition. We present here a techno-economic analysis of the lithic assemblage
recovered in a current excavation at this site that positively provides evidence of structured and
complex techno-economic behavior. The results are consistent with the current and uncontested consensus about
the Acheulean nature of the Developed Oldowan B. These results may also fuel a newly established debate. | es |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | es |
dc.language.iso | spa | es |
dc.publisher | ELSEVIER | es |
dc.rights.accessRights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | es |
dc.title | What comes after the Developed Oldowan B debate? Techno-economic data from SHK main site (Middle Bed II, Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania) | es |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | es |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2019.07.034 | es |
dc.peerreviewed | SI | es |
dc.type.hasVersion | info:eu-repo/semantics/draft | es |