Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem:https://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/65596
Título
Assessment of automated analysis of portable oximetry as a screening test for moderate-to-severe sleep apnea in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Autor
Año del Documento
2017
Editorial
PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
Descripción
Producción Científica
Documento Fuente
PLOS One, 2017, vol. 12, n. 11, p. e0188094.
Resumo
Background. The coexistence of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) leads to increased morbidity and mortality. The development of home-based screening tests is essential to expedite diagnosis. Nevertheless, there is still very limited evidence on the effectiveness of portable monitoring to diagnose OSAS in patients with pulmonary comorbidities. Objective. To assess the influence of suffering from COPD in the performance of an oximetry-based screening test for moderate-to-severe OSAS, both in the hospital and at home. Methods. A total of 407 patients showing moderate-to-high clinical suspicion of OSAS were involved in the study. All subjects underwent (i) supervised portable oximetry simultaneously to in-hospital polysomnography (PSG) and (ii) unsupervised portable oximetry at home. A regression- based multilayer perceptron (MLP) artificial neural network (ANN) was trained to estimate the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) from portable oximetry recordings. Two independent validation datasets were analyzed: COPD versus non-COPD. Results. The portable oximetry-based MLP ANN reached similar intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) values between the estimated AHI and the actual AHI for the non-COPD and the COPD groups either in the hospital (non-COPD: 0.937, 0.909-0.956; COPD: 0.936, 0.899-0.960) and at home (non-COPD: 0.731, 0.631-0.808; COPD: 0.788, 0.678-0.864). Regarding the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC), no statistically significant differences between COPD and non-COPD groups were found in both settings, particularly for severe OSAS (AHI ≥30 events/h): 0.97 (0.92-0.99) non-COPD vs. 0.98 (0.92-1) COPD in the hospital, and 0.87 (0.79-0.92) non-COPD vs. 0.86 (0.75-0.93) COPD at home. Conclusion. The agreement and the diagnostic performance of the estimated AHI from automated analysis of portable oximetry were similar regardless of the presence of COPD both in-lab and at-home. Particularly, portable oximetry could be used as an abbreviated screening test for moderate-to-severe OSAS in patients with COPD.
ISSN
1932-6203
Revisión por pares
SI
Patrocinador
This research has been partially supported by the project 265/2012 of the Sociedad Española de Neumología y Cirugía Torácica (SEPAR), projects RTC-2015-3446-1 and TEC2014-53196-R from the Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad and the European Regional Development Fund (FEDER), and the projects VA037U16 and GRS 752/A/13 from Junta de Castilla y León and FEDER. D. Álvarez was in receipt of a Juan de la Cierva grant IJCI-2014- 22664 from the Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad.
Version del Editor
Propietario de los Derechos
Andrés-Blanco et al.
Idioma
eng
Tipo de versión
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Derechos
openAccess
Aparece en las colecciones
Arquivos deste item
Nombre:
Tamaño:
3.518Mb
Formato:
Adobe PDF
Descripción:
Published version (Open Access)
Exceto quando indicado o contrário, a licença deste item é descrito como Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional