Silicone microbubbles after anti‐vascular endothelial growth factor injections in patients with wet age‐related macular degeneration: incidence, quantification and secondary optical coherence tomography artfacts

Abstract

ABSTRACT. PURPOSE: To report the incidence and quantity of silicone oil microbubbles and the relationship with the number of intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections and evaluate if microbubbles induce artefacts on optical coherence tomography (OCT) images. METHODS: Observational, descriptive, cross-sectional study. Patients with wet age-related macular degeneration were included who had been treated for 1 year minimally with anti-VEGF injections repackaged in the hospital pharmacy. Detection and quantification of silicone microbubbles by mydriatic biomicroscopic examination were conducted 1 month after the last injection. The numbers of microbubbles were quantified on a scale of 0–3: 0, none; 1 scarce (1–10 microbubbles); 2 moderate (10–30); or 3 numerous (>30). Shadowing on OCT images was classified as 0–3: 0, none; 1 obscuring some retinal layers; 2 obscuring all retinal layers; or 3 obscuring the retinal thickness. RESULTS: The study included 142 eyes of 98 patients (mean age, 82.4 years + 7.3; range, 65–97) treated with 2377 injections. Microbubbles were detected in 127 (89.4%) eyes, 62 (43.6%) with numerous microbubbles and 36 (25.4%) and 29 (20.4%), respectively, with scarce and moderate numbers. A positive correlation was found between the numbers of injections and intravitreal silicone (rho, 0.7). Optical coherence tomography (OCT) artefacts were detected in 11 eyes; the artefacts obscured all retinal layers in three eyes. No significant relationship could be established between the appearance of floaters and the microbubbles. CONCLUSION: The presence and number of silicone microbubbles were correlated with the number of intravitreal injections. Microbubbles can produce OCT artefacts, which can hinder the treatment decision.