Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorValencia-Nieto, Laura
dc.contributor.authorLópez-de la Rosa, Alberto
dc.contributor.authorLópez-Miguel, Alberto
dc.contributor.authorGonzález García, María J.
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-30T08:32:01Z
dc.date.available2024-08-30T08:32:01Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.citationContact Lens and Anterior Eye, Febrero 2024, vol. 47, n. 1.es
dc.identifier.issn1367-0484es
dc.identifier.urihttps://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/69558
dc.descriptionProducción Científicaes
dc.description.abstractPurpose: This study aimed to assess the subjective and objective differences among the steps of the contact lens discomfort (CLD) progression classification established by the Tear Film & Ocular Surface Society (TFOS) using questionnaires and clinical signs, and to propose a simplified classification. Methods: Contact lens (CL) wearers were evaluated in a single visit. The Contact Lens Dry Eye Questionnaire (CLDEQ)-8, the Contact Lens Discomfort Index, and Visual Analog Scales for discomfort and dryness were administered. The non-invasive break-up time, the tear film lipid layer thickness, conjunctival hyperaemia and papillae, lid-parallel conjunctival folds, the fluorescein tear film break-up time, corneal and conjunctival staining,lid wiper epitheliopathy, and the Schirmer test were assessed. Sign and symptom scores were compared among TFOS CLD progression steps using analysis of variance or the Kruskal–Wallis H test. Steps 1 and 2 (reduced comfort), and steps 3 and 4 (reduced wearing time) of the TFOS classification were combined to obtain a simplified classification, and the same comparison was performed. A p-value ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: One hundred-fifty CL wearers (97 women and 53 men) aged 34.4 ± 12.6 years were included. In the TFOS classification, there were significant differences between step 0 (no CLD) and the rest of the severity steps for the scores obtained in all questionnaires (p ≤ 0.015). All steps were differentiated (p ≤ 0.032) based on the simplified classification for all questionnaires, except steps 1 and 2 for the CLDEQ-8 and dryness VAS (p = 0.089 and p = 0.051, respectively). There were no differences (all p ≥ 0.06) between the sign scores among the steps of either classification. Conclusion: CLD management is encouraged from its first appearance. Simplifying the phases of CLD severity may allow a more accurate classification and a better awareness of the problem by clinicians and CL wearers by using more straightforward simple messages.es
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfes
dc.language.isoenges
dc.publisherElsevieres
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectLentes de contacto
dc.subject.classificationContact lenses
dc.subject.classificationDiscomfortes
dc.subject.classificationClassificationes
dc.subject.classificationQuestionnaireses
dc.titleClinical characterisation of contact lens discomfort progressiones
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2023.102096es
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1367048423003375?via%3Dihubes
dc.peerreviewedSIes
dc.description.projectThis study was partially supported by Grant FPU19/01109 from the Ministry of Universities and European Social Fund. Funders had no role in the study.es
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/submittedVersiones
dc.subject.unesco3201.09 Oftalmología


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem