Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
dc.contributor.author | Valencia-Nieto, Laura | |
dc.contributor.author | López-de la Rosa, Alberto | |
dc.contributor.author | López Miguel, Alberto | |
dc.contributor.author | González García, María J. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-08-30T08:32:01Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-08-30T08:32:01Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2024 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Contact Lens and Anterior Eye, Febrero 2024, vol. 47, n. 1. | es |
dc.identifier.issn | 1367-0484 | es |
dc.identifier.uri | https://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/69558 | |
dc.description | Producción Científica | es |
dc.description.abstract | Purpose: This study aimed to assess the subjective and objective differences among the steps of the contact lens discomfort (CLD) progression classification established by the Tear Film & Ocular Surface Society (TFOS) using questionnaires and clinical signs, and to propose a simplified classification. Methods: Contact lens (CL) wearers were evaluated in a single visit. The Contact Lens Dry Eye Questionnaire (CLDEQ)-8, the Contact Lens Discomfort Index, and Visual Analog Scales for discomfort and dryness were administered. The non-invasive break-up time, the tear film lipid layer thickness, conjunctival hyperaemia and papillae, lid-parallel conjunctival folds, the fluorescein tear film break-up time, corneal and conjunctival staining,lid wiper epitheliopathy, and the Schirmer test were assessed. Sign and symptom scores were compared among TFOS CLD progression steps using analysis of variance or the Kruskal–Wallis H test. Steps 1 and 2 (reduced comfort), and steps 3 and 4 (reduced wearing time) of the TFOS classification were combined to obtain a simplified classification, and the same comparison was performed. A p-value ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: One hundred-fifty CL wearers (97 women and 53 men) aged 34.4 ± 12.6 years were included. In the TFOS classification, there were significant differences between step 0 (no CLD) and the rest of the severity steps for the scores obtained in all questionnaires (p ≤ 0.015). All steps were differentiated (p ≤ 0.032) based on the simplified classification for all questionnaires, except steps 1 and 2 for the CLDEQ-8 and dryness VAS (p = 0.089 and p = 0.051, respectively). There were no differences (all p ≥ 0.06) between the sign scores among the steps of either classification. Conclusion: CLD management is encouraged from its first appearance. Simplifying the phases of CLD severity may allow a more accurate classification and a better awareness of the problem by clinicians and CL wearers by using more straightforward simple messages. | es |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | es |
dc.language.iso | eng | es |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | es |
dc.rights.accessRights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | es |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | * |
dc.subject | Lentes de contacto | |
dc.subject.classification | Contact lens | es |
dc.subject.classification | Discomfort | es |
dc.subject.classification | Classification | es |
dc.subject.classification | Questionnaires | es |
dc.title | Clinical characterisation of contact lens discomfort progression | es |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | es |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2023.102096 | es |
dc.relation.publisherversion | https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1367048423003375?via%3Dihub | es |
dc.peerreviewed | SI | es |
dc.description.project | This study was partially supported by Grant FPU19/01109 from the Ministry of Universities and European Social Fund. Funders had no role in the study. | es |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional | * |
dc.type.hasVersion | info:eu-repo/semantics/submittedVersion | es |
dc.subject.unesco | 3201.09 Oftalmología |
Ficheros en el ítem
Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)
La licencia del ítem se describe como Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional