Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorCarrasco Uribarren, Andoni
dc.contributor.authorPardos Aguilella, Pilar
dc.contributor.authorJiménez del Barrio, Sandra 
dc.contributor.authorCabanillas Barea, Sara
dc.contributor.authorPérez Guillén, Silvia
dc.contributor.authorCeballos Laita, Luis 
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-20T09:58:20Z
dc.date.available2024-12-20T09:58:20Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.citationMusculoskeletal Science and Practice, 2024, vol. 71, 102927es
dc.identifier.issn2468-7812es
dc.identifier.urihttps://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/72942
dc.descriptionProducción Científicaes
dc.description.abstractBackground: Cervical and thoracic thrust or non-thrust manipulations have shown to be effective in patients with neck pain, but there is a lack of studies comparing both interventions in patients with neck pain. Objective: To investigate the effects of cervical thrust or non-thrust manipulations compared to thoracic or cervicothoracic manipulations for improving pain, disability, and range of motion in patients with neck pain. Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Method: Searches were performed in PubMed, PEDro, Cochrane Library, CINHAL, and Web of Science databases from inception to May 22, 2023. Randomized clinical trials comparing cervical thrust or non-thrust manipulations to thoracic or cervicothoracic manipulations were included. Methodological quality was assessed with PEDro scale, and the certainty of evidence was evaluated using GRADE guidelines. Results: Six studies were included. Meta-analyses revealed no differences between cervical thrust or non-thrust manipulations and thoracic or cervicothoracic manipulations in pain intensity, disability, or cervical range of motion in any plane. The certainty of evidence was downgraded to very low for pain intensity, to moderate or very low for disability and to low or very low for cervical range of motion. Conclusion: There is moderate to very low certainty evidence that there is no difference in effectiveness between cervical thrust or non-thrust manipulations and thoracic or cervicothoracic manipulations for improving pain, disability, and range of motion in patients with neck pain.es
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfes
dc.language.isoenges
dc.publisherElsevieres
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/*
dc.subject.classificationNeck paines
dc.subject.classificationMusculoskeletal manipulationses
dc.subject.classificationSpinal manipulationes
dc.subject.classificationPain intensityes
dc.subject.classificationDisabilityes
dc.titleCervical manipulation versus thoracic or cervicothoracic manipulations for the management of neck pain. A systematic review and meta-analysises
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees
dc.rights.holder© 2024 The Authorses
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.msksp.2024.102927es
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468781224000225es
dc.identifier.publicationfirstpage102927es
dc.identifier.publicationtitleMusculoskeletal Science and Practicees
dc.identifier.publicationvolume71es
dc.peerreviewedSIes
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional*
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem