Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
dc.contributor.author | Arroyo del Arroyo, Cristina | |
dc.contributor.author | Fernández Martínez, Itziar | |
dc.contributor.author | Novo Díez, Andrea | |
dc.contributor.author | Blanco Vázquez, Marta | |
dc.contributor.author | López Miguel, Alberto | |
dc.contributor.author | González García, María Jesús | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-01-26T15:10:00Z | |
dc.date.available | 2025-01-26T15:10:00Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021-05 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Arroyo-Del Arroyo C, Fernández I, Novo-Diez A, Blanco-Vázquez M, López-Miguel A, González-García MJ. Contact Lens Discomfort Management: Outcomes of Common Interventions. Eye Contact Lens. 2021;47(5):256-264. | es |
dc.identifier.issn | 1542-2321 | es |
dc.identifier.uri | https://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/74405 | |
dc.description | Producción Científica | es |
dc.description.abstract | Purpose: To assess the consecutive implementation of habitual contact lens discomfort (CLD) management strategies: lid hygiene, daily disposable CL (DDCL) fitting, and artificial tear (AT) supplementation. Methods: Contact lens (CL) wearers with CLD symptoms (CLDEQ-8 ≥12 points) were included in the study. Subjects with Meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) were instructed to perform lid hygiene. All participants were fitted with a DDCL (delefilcon A) and evaluated 1 month later. After, half of them were randomly assigned to use AT (Povidone-2%) at least three times/day, and all participants were evaluated 1 month later. Tests performed were: lower tear meniscus area (LTMA), bulbar, limbal, and tarsal hyperemia, noninvasive tear break-up time (NITBUT), and corneal and conjunctival staining. Weighted combined clinical scores (CS) were created to analyze signs. Changes in symptoms (CLDEQ-8) and CS were analyzed using linear mixed models. Results: Forty-two subjects (mean age: 23.2±4.9 years) completed the study. Two CS were created, CS 1 was composed of bulbar, limbal, and tarsal hyperemia and corneal staining, and CS 2 by NITBUT, LTMA, and conjunctival staining. CLDEQ-8 was reduced after lid hygiene (mean: -2.73±2.13; P=0.012) and DDCL use (mean: -10.1±3.54; P<0.01), but not after AT use (P=0.62). CS 1 did not change after any intervention. CS-2 was higher (P=0.04) in DGM subjects after lid hygiene, it decreased (P=0.04) after DDCL use. Conclusions: Lid hygiene is effective for reducing CLD symptoms in MGD patients. Refitting subjects with delefilcon A is an effective intervention for CLD to reduce symptoms and achieve a healthier ocular surface. Simultaneous administration of AT did not further improve CLD. | es |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | es |
dc.language.iso | spa | es |
dc.publisher | LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS | es |
dc.rights.accessRights | info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess | es |
dc.title | Contact Lens Discomfort Management: Outcomes of Common Interventions | es |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | es |
dc.rights.holder | 2020 Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists, Inc. | es |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000727 | es |
dc.identifier.publicationfirstpage | 256 | es |
dc.identifier.publicationissue | 5 | es |
dc.identifier.publicationlastpage | 264 | es |
dc.identifier.publicationtitle | Eye & Contact Lens: Science & Clinical Practice | es |
dc.identifier.publicationvolume | 47 | es |
dc.peerreviewed | SI | es |
dc.type.hasVersion | info:eu-repo/semantics/draft | es |