Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorArroyo del Arroyo, Cristina 
dc.contributor.authorFernández Martínez, Itziar 
dc.contributor.authorNovo Díez, Andrea 
dc.contributor.authorBlanco Vázquez, Marta 
dc.contributor.authorLópez Miguel, Alberto 
dc.contributor.authorGonzález García, María Jesús 
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-26T15:10:00Z
dc.date.available2025-01-26T15:10:00Z
dc.date.issued2021-05
dc.identifier.citationArroyo-Del Arroyo C, Fernández I, Novo-Diez A, Blanco-Vázquez M, López-Miguel A, González-García MJ. Contact Lens Discomfort Management: Outcomes of Common Interventions. Eye Contact Lens. 2021;47(5):256-264.es
dc.identifier.issn1542-2321es
dc.identifier.urihttps://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/74405
dc.descriptionProducción Científicaes
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To assess the consecutive implementation of habitual contact lens discomfort (CLD) management strategies: lid hygiene, daily disposable CL (DDCL) fitting, and artificial tear (AT) supplementation. Methods: Contact lens (CL) wearers with CLD symptoms (CLDEQ-8 ≥12 points) were included in the study. Subjects with Meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) were instructed to perform lid hygiene. All participants were fitted with a DDCL (delefilcon A) and evaluated 1 month later. After, half of them were randomly assigned to use AT (Povidone-2%) at least three times/day, and all participants were evaluated 1 month later. Tests performed were: lower tear meniscus area (LTMA), bulbar, limbal, and tarsal hyperemia, noninvasive tear break-up time (NITBUT), and corneal and conjunctival staining. Weighted combined clinical scores (CS) were created to analyze signs. Changes in symptoms (CLDEQ-8) and CS were analyzed using linear mixed models. Results: Forty-two subjects (mean age: 23.2±4.9 years) completed the study. Two CS were created, CS 1 was composed of bulbar, limbal, and tarsal hyperemia and corneal staining, and CS 2 by NITBUT, LTMA, and conjunctival staining. CLDEQ-8 was reduced after lid hygiene (mean: -2.73±2.13; P=0.012) and DDCL use (mean: -10.1±3.54; P<0.01), but not after AT use (P=0.62). CS 1 did not change after any intervention. CS-2 was higher (P=0.04) in DGM subjects after lid hygiene, it decreased (P=0.04) after DDCL use. Conclusions: Lid hygiene is effective for reducing CLD symptoms in MGD patients. Refitting subjects with delefilcon A is an effective intervention for CLD to reduce symptoms and achieve a healthier ocular surface. Simultaneous administration of AT did not further improve CLD.es
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfes
dc.language.isospaes
dc.publisherLIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINSes
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccesses
dc.titleContact Lens Discomfort Management: Outcomes of Common Interventionses
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees
dc.rights.holder2020 Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists, Inc.es
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/ICL.0000000000000727es
dc.identifier.publicationfirstpage256es
dc.identifier.publicationissue5es
dc.identifier.publicationlastpage264es
dc.identifier.publicationtitleEye & Contact Lens: Science & Clinical Practicees
dc.identifier.publicationvolume47es
dc.peerreviewedSIes
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/draftes


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem