dc.contributor.author | Martínez Plaza, Elena | |
dc.contributor.author | Marcos, Mario | |
dc.contributor.author | López De La Rosa, Alberto | |
dc.contributor.author | López Miguel, Alberto | |
dc.contributor.author | Maldonado López, Miguel José | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-02-27T12:20:19Z | |
dc.date.available | 2025-02-27T12:20:19Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2023 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 2023, vol. 49, n. 1, p. 21-28. | es |
dc.identifier.issn | 0886-3350 | es |
dc.identifier.uri | https://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/75174 | |
dc.description.abstract | Purpose: To assess the repeatability and agreement of Cartesian coordinates and the length of apparent chord mu and pupil diameter measurements during static (Galilei G4) and dynamic (Topolyzer Vario) evaluations.
Setting: IOBA-Eye Institute, Valladolid, Spain.
Design: Case series.
Methods: 3 consecutive measurements per scenario (Galilei G4 and Topolyzer Vario under low mesopic and photopic conditions) were performed by the same clinician. The intrasession repeatability was assessed using the within-subject SD (Sw), the precision, the coefficient of variation, and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The agreement was analyzed using repeated-measures analysis of variance and the Bland-Altman method.
Results: Thirty-seven healthy participants were recruited. The Sw values for chord mu parameters and pupil diameter ranged from 0.01 to 0.03 and 0.08 to 0.21, respectively. The ICC was ≥0.89 for all parameters. Galilei G4 and Topolyzer Vario under low mesopic and photopic conditions provided significantly different measures of apparent chord mu length (0.23 ± 0.11 mm, 0.30 ± 0.10 mm, and 0.25 ± 0.11 mm, respectively, P ≤ .02), X-coordinate (-0.18 ± 0.12 mm, -0.27 ± 0.11 mm, and -0.21 ± 0.12 mm, respectively, P < .001), and pupil diameter (3.38 ± 0.50 mm, 6.29 ± 0.60 mm, and 3.04 ± 0.41 mm, respectively, P < .001). Y-coordinate values obtained by Galilei G4 and Topolyzer Vario under low mesopic conditions were significantly different (0.06 ± 0.13 mm vs 0.03 ± 0.11 mm, respectively, P = .02), in contrast to Galilei G4 and Topolyzer Vario under photopic conditions (0.05 ± 0.13 mm, P = .82) and both illumination conditions of Topolyzer Vario (P ≥ .23).
Conclusions: Galilei G4 and Topolyzer Vario provide consistent measurements of apparent chord mu Cartesian coordinates and length, as well as pupil diameter; however, the measurements are not interchangeable. Ophthalmic surgeons should consider these findings when planning customized intraocular lens implantation and refractive surgery procedures. | es |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | es |
dc.language.iso | eng | es |
dc.rights.accessRights | info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess | es |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | |
dc.subject.classification | Chord mu | es |
dc.subject.classification | Scheimpflug and Placido-disk technology | |
dc.subject.classification | repeatability | |
dc.subject.classification | agreement | |
dc.title | Reliability and agreement of apparent chord mu measurements between static and dynamic evaluations | es |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | es |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001036 | es |
dc.relation.publisherversion | https://journals.lww.com/jcrs/abstract/2023/01000/reliability_and_agreement_of_apparent_chord_mu.6.aspx | es |
dc.identifier.publicationfirstpage | 21 | es |
dc.identifier.publicationissue | 1 | es |
dc.identifier.publicationlastpage | 28 | es |
dc.identifier.publicationtitle | Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery | es |
dc.identifier.publicationvolume | 49 | es |
dc.peerreviewed | SI | es |
dc.identifier.essn | 1873-4502 | es |
dc.rights | Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivados 4.0 Internacional | |
dc.type.hasVersion | info:eu-repo/semantics/draft | es |