Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTerrados, C.
dc.contributor.authorGonzález Francés, Diego
dc.contributor.authorAlonso Gómez, Víctor 
dc.contributor.authorGonzález Rebollo, Miguel Ángel 
dc.contributor.authorJiménez López, Juan Ignacio 
dc.contributor.authorMartínez Sacristán, Óscar 
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-04T09:56:22Z
dc.date.available2025-03-04T09:56:22Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Electronic Materials (2023) 52:5189–5198es
dc.identifier.issn0361-5235es
dc.identifier.urihttps://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/75209
dc.descriptionProducción Científicaes
dc.description.abstractNowadays, silicon solar plants consist of hundreds of thousands of panels. The detection and characterization of solar cell defects, particularly on-site, is crucial to maintaining high productivity at the solar plant. Among the different techniques for the inspection of the solar cell defects, luminescence techniques provide very useful information about the spatial distribution of defects. Electroluminescence performed in dark conditions (nEL) is the most commonly used technique. However, daylight EL (dEL) and daylight photoluminescence (dPL) have recently attracted interest, because they present noteworthy advantages for on-site inspections. In this paper, we present a detailed characterization of both damaged mono- and multicrystalline silicon solar cells using dEL and dPL, comparing the results provided by these techniques with those obtained with high-resolution nEL and indoor PL (performed under excitation with a laser diode). Among these techniques, dEL provides reliable and reproducible results, while dPL shows more dependence on the experimental conditions, demanding additional efforts for analysis. The limited resolution obtained with the actual IR camera technologies is a limiting factor of the dEL and dPL techniques. On the other hand, they can be performed on-site, testing a very large number of panels. Therefore, we can assert that on-site dEL is well suited for massive inspection of solar plants, while more research is necessary for dPL.es
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfes
dc.language.isoenges
dc.publisherSpringeres
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.titleComparison of Outdoor and Indoor PL and EL Images in Si Solar Cells and Panels for Defect Detection and Classificationes
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11664-023-10535-2es
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11664-023-10535-2es
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11664-023-10535-2
dc.identifier.publicationfirstpage5189es
dc.identifier.publicationissue8es
dc.identifier.publicationlastpage5198es
dc.identifier.publicationtitleJournal of Electronic Materialses
dc.identifier.publicationvolume52es
dc.peerreviewedSIes
dc.description.projectPID2020-113533RB-C33es
dc.description.projectUnion NextGenerationEU/PRTRes
dc.identifier.essn1543-186Xes
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivados 4.0 Internacional
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersiones


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record