Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorLahuerta-Martín, Silvia
dc.contributor.authorRobles-Pérez, Román
dc.contributor.authorHernando-Garijo, Ignacio
dc.contributor.authorJiménez-del-Barrio, Sandra
dc.contributor.authorHernández-Lázaro, Héctor
dc.contributor.authorMingo-Gómez, María Teresa
dc.contributor.authorCeballos-Laita, Luis
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-21T15:53:05Z
dc.date.available2025-08-21T15:53:05Z
dc.date.issued2023-07-10
dc.identifier.citationBMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation, Julio 2023, vol. 15, n. 1, p. 81es
dc.identifier.urihttps://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/77080
dc.descriptionProducción Científicaes
dc.description.abstractBackground: Groin pain is a common pathology among athletes, presenting pain and a reduced range of motion (ROM) as clinical characteristics. Passive physical therapy (PPT) and exercise therapy (ET) interventions are chosen firstly before surgery. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was: (i) to qualitative review the effects of each non-surgical intervention; (ii) to quantitative compare the effects of PPTs plus ET intervention to ET in isolation in pain intensity, and hip ROM in athletes with groin pain. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted. Pubmed, PEDro, Web of science, Scopus and Cochrane library were searched. Randomized controlled trials comparing PPT plus ET to ET interventions were included. The methodological quality and risk of bias of the included studies, were assessed with the PEDro scale and the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. To assess the certainty of evidence the GRADEpro GDT was used. Meta-analyses were conducted using RevMan 5.4 using mean difference analysis to assess the variables pain intensity and hip ROM. Results: A total of 175 studies was identified from the consulted databases. Five studies were included for systematicreview, from which three studies were meta-analyzed. The methodological quality of the included studies ranged from poor to high. ET compared to PPT plus ET provided statistically significant improvements in pain intensity in the short-term (MD = 2.45; 95% CI 1.11, 3.79; I2 :65%). No statistically significant differences between interventions were obtained for hip ROM in the short-term. Conclusions: The qualitative review showed that PPTs plus ET and ET seem to have positive effects on pain intensity and hip ROM. The quantitative analysis found very low certainty of evidence proposing a positive effect in pain intensity for ET interventions based on hip muscles stretching, compared to PPT combined with ET, in the short-term.es
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfes
dc.language.isoenges
dc.publisherBMCes
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subject.classificationGroin paines
dc.subject.classificationManual therapyes
dc.subject.classificationPaines
dc.subject.classificationRange of motiones
dc.titleThe effectiveness of non-surgical interventions in athletes with groin pain: a systematic review and meta-analysises
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s13102-023-00684-6es
dc.identifier.publicationissue1es
dc.identifier.publicationtitleBMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitationes
dc.identifier.publicationvolume15es
dc.peerreviewedSIes
dc.identifier.essn2052-1847es
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem