Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAlonso Pastor, Luis Eduardo 
dc.contributor.authorMorcillo López, Miguel Ángel 
dc.contributor.authorLaguna Gutiérrez, Ester
dc.contributor.authorBaños, Paula
dc.contributor.authorGarcía, J.
dc.contributor.authorMoreno, J.L.
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez Pérez, Miguel Ángel 
dc.contributor.authorNuñez Carrero, Karina Carla 
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-17T14:09:01Z
dc.date.available2025-12-17T14:09:01Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.identifier.citationConstruction and Building Materials, 2025, vol. 502, p. 144309es
dc.identifier.issn0950-0618es
dc.identifier.urihttps://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/80731
dc.descriptionProducción Científicaes
dc.description.abstractThis study investigates the manufacture and environmental assessment of acoustic insulation foams made from recycled polyethylene (RM) from packaging film waste. Blends of RM with virgin polyethylene (PE) and ethylene-vinyl acetate (EVA) were used to produce cellular structures through chemical (Ch) and physical (Ph) foaming processes. The aim was to develop materials with properties comparable to commercial acoustic insulation products in construction sector, assessing structural integrity and acoustic performance via dynamic stiffness. Products with performance like the commercial were achieved with recycled content ranging from 40 to 80 wt%. These successful cases were also evaluated for environmental impact. The life cycle assessment considered two approaches: one analysing the production of 1 kg of foam (standardized density values), where physical foaming showed a lower environmental footprint, and the other evaluating the mass needed to achieve the dynamic stiffness of the commercial reference (empirical density values), which favoured chemical foaming for producing foams with comparable properties but lower densities. Although physical foaming has environ- mental advantages, the higher densities achieved with RM limit its viability. Consequently, chemical foaming is more environmentally favourable due to lower material consumption. Therefore, Ch_RM:EVA,80:20 is optimal for technical requirements, while Ch_RM:PE,40:60 is more environmentally advantageous. The compromise solution that addresses both technical and environmental aspects is Ch_RM:EVA,40:60. This foam showed acoustic performance equivalent to the commercial, achieved through a manufacturing process and recycled content minimizing environmental impacts. Furthermore, transforming packaging waste into a long-lasting product also reduces waste accumulation and delays non-sustainable but necessary processes like energy generation.es
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfes
dc.language.isoenges
dc.publisherElsevieres
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/*
dc.subject.classificationPackaging wastees
dc.subject.classificationBlends polymeres
dc.subject.classificationRecycled polymeres
dc.subject.classificationLow-density foamses
dc.subject.classificationAcoustic insulationes
dc.subject.classificationLife cycle analysises
dc.titleResearch on the manufacture and environmental assessment of vibration and structure-borne sound insulation foams from packaging film wastees
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees
dc.rights.holder© 2025 The Author(s)es
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.144309es
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950061825044617es
dc.identifier.publicationfirstpage144309es
dc.identifier.publicationtitleConstruction and Building Materialses
dc.identifier.publicationvolume502es
dc.peerreviewedSIes
dc.description.projectMinisterio de Economía y Competitividad (MINECO) (Proyecto ECOLAYER - TED2021–129419B-C22)es
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional*
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record