Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.contributor.authorPara Prieto, Marta
dc.contributor.authorMartín Herranz, Raúl 
dc.contributor.authorCrespo, Sara
dc.contributor.authorMena García, Laura 
dc.contributor.authorValisena Frías, Andrés Eduardo
dc.contributor.authorCordero, Lisandro
dc.contributor.authorGonzález Fernández, Sara
dc.contributor.authorArenillas Lara, Juan Francisco 
dc.contributor.authorTéllez Lara, María de las Nieves 
dc.contributor.authorPastor Jimeno, José Carlos 
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-23T16:46:04Z
dc.date.available2025-12-23T16:46:04Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationClin Ophthalmol. 2021;15:2025-2036es
dc.identifier.urihttps://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/81033
dc.descriptionProducción Científica
dc.description.abstractObjective: To evaluate the agreement between the peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (pRNFL) and foveal thickness (FT) measurements among three different spectral domain-optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) instruments in a sample of multiple sclerosis (MS) patients and a healthy age-matched control group. Methods: An observational cross-sectional study with three groups: healthy subjects and MS patients w/w a previous clinical diagnosis of optic neuritis (ON) was conducted. The pRNFL and FT were measured using three different SD-OCT instruments (OCT PRIMUS 200 and OCT CIRRUS 500 SD-OCT [Carl Zeiss Meditec] and OCT 3D 2000 [Topcon]). Results: Twenty eyes from 10 healthy subjects matched in age with MS patients without a previous history of eye disease and 62 MS eyes from 31 MS patients (29 eyes without history of ON and 33 eyes with history of ON) were enrolled. Healthy subjects and MS patients without ON did not show differences between the pRNFL and FT thickness (P>0.99) with any of the instruments. However, MS eyes with a previous episode of ON showed thinner pRNFL and FT (P<0.01). PRIMUS and CIRRUS OCT showed better agreement of the pRNLF and FT in both healthy and MS eyes. However, 3D OCT showed less agreement in the pRNFL measurement with CIRRUS in both healthy and MS eyes. Interpretation: Although OCT is a valuable technology to improve MS patient assessment, differences between devices must be taken into account. It is necessary to create an international group that standardizes the measurement conditions and above all that provides reference bases for normal subjects.es
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfes
dc.language.isoenges
dc.publisherDOVE PRESSes
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
dc.subjectOftalmologíaes
dc.subjectOptometríaes
dc.subject.classificationfoveal thicknesses
dc.subject.classificationretinal nerve fiber layeres
dc.subject.classificationmultiple sclerosises
dc.titleOCT Variability Prevents Their Use as Robust Biomarkers in Multiple Sclerosises
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees
dc.rights.holder© 2021 The Authors
dc.identifier.doi10.2147/OPTH.S309703es
dc.identifier.publicationfirstpage2025es
dc.identifier.publicationlastpage2036es
dc.identifier.publicationtitleClinical Ophthalmologyes
dc.identifier.publicationvolumeVolume 15es
dc.peerreviewedSIes
dc.identifier.essn1177-5483es
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones
dc.subject.unesco3201.09 Oftalmologíaes
dc.subject.unesco2209.15 Optometríaes


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

Thumbnail

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée