Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSus, Adán
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-02T09:48:18Z
dc.date.available2026-01-02T09:48:18Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.citationJournal for General Philosophy of Science, 2024, 55, 547–577.es
dc.identifier.issn0925-4560es
dc.identifier.urihttps://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/81146
dc.description.abstractIn this paper, I address the significance of the key notions of coordination, constitution and convention. My aim in so doing is to provide a better understanding of their relation to conventionalism and to evaluate the prospects for a version of the relativized a priori based on a refinement of the notion of coordination. I stress the Kantian roots of all three concepts. Moreover, I argue that the link between the early logical positivist requirement for the uniqueness of coordination and the Kantian account of empirical objectivity provides an interpretive key that sheds light on the alleged incompatibility between constitutive principles and conventionalism.es
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfes
dc.language.isoenges
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses
dc.titleCoordination, Convention and the Constitution of Physical Objectses
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10838-023-09671-4es
dc.identifier.publicationfirstpage547es
dc.identifier.publicationissue4es
dc.identifier.publicationlastpage577es
dc.identifier.publicationtitleJournal for General Philosophy of Sciencees
dc.identifier.publicationvolume55es
dc.peerreviewedSIes
dc.identifier.essn1572-8587es
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record