Zur Kurzanzeige

dc.contributor.authorBello Hutt, Donald
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-18T06:41:08Z
dc.date.available2026-02-18T06:41:08Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.citationRevus, 2024, 02, 2024, 52, 1-15es
dc.identifier.issn1581-7652es
dc.identifier.urihttps://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/82844
dc.descriptionProducción Científicaes
dc.description.abstractIs the state necessary for the rule of law to emerge? Paolo Sandro thinks it is not. I, by contrast, think it is. The reason for my disagreement can be summarised as follows: Sandro misrepresents the contractarian narrative warranting the existence of the state’s right to rule over its subjects. This leads him to conclusions potentially at odds with his concern for legal otherness and, by implication, for the rule of law. My suggestion is that there is no legal otherness, no ius constraining lex, no rule of law, without the state.es
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfes
dc.language.isospaes
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.titleThe State and legal othernesses
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees
dc.identifier.doi10.4000/revus.10044es
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://journals.openedition.org/revus/10044es
dc.identifier.publicationfirstpage1es
dc.identifier.publicationissue52es
dc.identifier.publicationlastpage15es
dc.identifier.publicationtitleRevuses
dc.identifier.publicationvolume52es
dc.peerreviewedSIes
dc.identifier.essn1855-7112es
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones


Dateien zu dieser Ressource

Thumbnail

Das Dokument erscheint in:

Zur Kurzanzeige