| dc.contributor.author | Bello Hutt, Donald | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-02-24T06:26:15Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-02-24T06:26:15Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2021-06-25 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence , Vol. 34 , no. 2, 259 - 281 | es |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0841-8209 | es |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/83024 | |
| dc.description | Producción Científica | es |
| dc.description.abstract | Courts do many good things. Judges carefully consider individual claims and arguments,1 and contrast them against the law in light of evidence. Their decisions are argued for, are public, and can be contested in form and content in different hierarchical stages. Additionally, and among other things, these practices are said to contribute to the will-formation of the public sphere and improve the quality of the legislative process.2 | es |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | es |
| dc.language.iso | spa | es |
| dc.publisher | Cambridge University Press | es |
| dc.rights.accessRights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | es |
| dc.title | Making What Present Again? A Critique of Argumentative Judicial Representation | es |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | es |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1017/cjlj.2021.6 | es |
| dc.relation.publisherversion | https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/canadian-journal-of-law-and-jurisprudence/article/abs/making-what-present-again-a-critique-of-argumentative-judicial-representation/364F5FFF104971BF743D860D4A61753F | es |
| dc.identifier.publicationfirstpage | 259 | es |
| dc.identifier.publicationissue | 2 | es |
| dc.identifier.publicationlastpage | 281 | es |
| dc.identifier.publicationtitle | Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence | es |
| dc.identifier.publicationvolume | 34 | es |
| dc.peerreviewed | SI | es |
| dc.identifier.essn | 2056-4260 | es |
| dc.type.hasVersion | info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion | es |
