Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.contributor.authorBello Hutt, Donald
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-24T06:47:23Z
dc.date.available2026-02-24T06:47:23Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationRatio Juris, enero 2021, vol. 33, no. 4, 51-367es
dc.identifier.issn0952-1917es
dc.identifier.urihttps://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/83027
dc.descriptionProducción Científicaes
dc.description.abstractThis article analogises political representation to legal interpretation. It then applies the analogy to the hitherto neglected question of what political representation means for deliberative constitutionalism. The upshot is a conception of deliberative constitutionalism that, while uncompromisingly grounded in the reasoned expression of the preferences of a polity's constituents through deliberative democratic institutional innovations, mandates representatives to translate those preferences into general and abstract constitutional law. It thus enhances the deliberative contribution of citizens in the determination of constitutional meaning, while preserving the value of representative institutions.es
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfes
dc.language.isospaes
dc.publisherSpringeres
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses
dc.titlePolitical Representation as Interpretation: A Contribution to Deliberative Constitutionalismes
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/raju.12300es
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/raju.12300es
dc.identifier.publicationfirstpage351es
dc.identifier.publicationissue4es
dc.identifier.publicationlastpage367es
dc.identifier.publicationtitleRatio Jurises
dc.identifier.publicationvolume33es
dc.peerreviewedSIes
dc.identifier.essn1467-9337es
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersiones


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

Thumbnail

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée