Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.contributor.authorRodero Raya, María del Rosario 
dc.contributor.authorCarvajal, Andrea
dc.contributor.authorCastro, Víctor
dc.contributor.authorNavia, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorPrada Moraga, César de 
dc.contributor.authorLebrero Fernández, Raquel 
dc.contributor.authorMuñoz Torre, Raúl 
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-25T10:01:36Z
dc.date.available2026-02-25T10:01:36Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationBiomass and Bioenergy, December 2019, Volume 131,105414es
dc.identifier.issn0961-9534es
dc.identifier.urihttps://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/83068
dc.descriptionProducción Científicaes
dc.description.abstractThe design and evaluation of a control system for a photosynthetic biogas upgrading unit was successfully carried out in this study. This control system ensured a specific biomethane quality under any disturbance in the biogas flowrate. The recycling liquid flowrate, and indirectly the liquid to biogas (L/G) ratio, was selected as the manipulated variable in order to maintain the CO2 and O2 content of biomethane, and therefore comply with the requirements for its use as natural gas substitute (<2.5% and <1.0%, respectively). The control system was able to maintain the biomethane CO2 content below the set point value under a stepwise increase in the biogas flowrate from 60 to 150 ml/min, together with negligible H2S concentrations and an O2 stripping from the recycling liquid to the biomethane lower than 1%, thus obtaining a consistent biomethane quality over time. On the contrary, the biomethane CO2 content increased up to 13.2% under this stepwise increase in the biogas flowrate without control system. Successful results were also obtained when the control system was challenged with stepwise surges in the biogas flowrate between 60 and 120 ml/min under different temperatures (15 and 35 ºC) and inorganic carbon concentrations (1500, 500 and 100 mg/L) when the recycling liquid entering the absorption column presented a pH 10. However, the high liquid flowrates required at a cultivation broth pH of 8.5 as a result of the low CO2 mass transfer led to an excessive O2 desorption to the biomethane, resulting in biomethane O2 contents >1%.es
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfes
dc.language.isospaes
dc.publisherElsevieres
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccesses
dc.titleDevelopment of a control strategy to cope with biogas flowrate variations during photosynthetic biogas upgradinges
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees
dc.rights.holderElsevieres
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.biombioe.2019.105414es
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0961953419303630es
dc.identifier.publicationfirstpage105414es
dc.identifier.publicationtitleBiomass and Bioenergyes
dc.identifier.publicationvolume131es
dc.peerreviewedSIes
dc.description.projectThis work was supported by the INCOVER project. The project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No. 689242.es
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/submittedVersiones


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

Thumbnail

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée