Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSobrino Pérez, Alicia
dc.contributor.authorPérez Escudero, Alfonso
dc.contributor.authorSánchez García, Luisa
dc.contributor.authorSanz Ballesteros, María Sandra 
dc.contributor.authorFelipe Fernández, Carmen
dc.contributor.authorHernández García, Esther
dc.contributor.authorOviedo Gómez, Victoria
dc.contributor.authorToro Casado, Raquel de
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez Gómez, Astrid
dc.contributor.authorFernández-Reyes Luis, María José
dc.contributor.authorPérez Díaz, Vicente
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-13T12:26:22Z
dc.date.available2026-03-13T12:26:22Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.identifier.citationPreprintes
dc.identifier.urihttps://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/83416
dc.descriptionProducción Científicaes
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: An increase in body mass index (BMI) raises intraperitoneal pressure (IPP), which in turn counteracts ultrafiltration (UF). However, BMI is not directly associated with UF, contrary to what might be expected. We examined these relationships in greater depth by breaking down BMI into fat tissue index (FTI), lean tissue index (LTI), and overhydration (OHI), assessed by bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS). Methods: Two peritoneal equilibration tests (PETs) using 4.25%/3.86% dextrose (2 L and 1 L fill volumes) were performed in 76 unselected patients. IPP was measured repeatedly and BIS was conducted to calculate LTI, FTI, OHI and phase angle at 50 kHz (PhA). Results: IPP increased with intraperitoneal volume (empty: 7.8 cmH₂O; 1 L: 10.3 cmH₂O; 2 L: 12.2 cmH₂O) and correlated negatively with UF. BMI correlated positively with IPP but not with UF. FTI correlated positively with BMI and IPP and negatively with UF. LTI did not correlate with BMI or IPP but correlated positively with UF. These relationships were mirrored in aquaporinmediated free water transport (FWT). PhA mirrored LTI. Conclusions: The effects of BMI on IPP and of IPP on UF appear to be mediated by FTI, whereas LTI independently enhances UF. Aquaporin-mediated FWT shows similar associations. Routine assessment of IPP and body composition may help identify patients at higher risk for IPP-related UF impairment.es
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfes
dc.language.isoenges
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectNefrologíaes
dc.subjectFisiología humanaes
dc.subjectBioquímica clínicaes
dc.subjectPatologíaes
dc.subject.classificationBioimpedanciaes
dc.subject.classificationPresión intraperitoneales
dc.subject.classificationUltrafiltraciónes
dc.subject.classificationAcuaporinases
dc.subject.classificationMasa magraes
dc.subject.classificationMasa grasaes
dc.subject.classificationÁngulo de fasees
dc.titleImpact of Body Composition on Intraperitoneal Pressure and Ultrafiltration in Peritoneal Dialysises
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees
dc.rights.holder© 2026 The Authorses
dc.peerreviewedNOes
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/submittedVersiones
dc.subject.unesco3205.06 Nefrologíaes
dc.subject.unesco2410.10 Fisiología Humanaes
dc.subject.unesco3207 Patologíaes


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record