<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-04-30T00:42:53Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:uvadoc.uva.es:10324/21498" metadataPrefix="rdf">https://uvadoc.uva.es/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:uvadoc.uva.es:10324/21498</identifier><datestamp>2025-05-07T09:13:46Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_10324_1146</setSpec><setSpec>com_10324_931</setSpec><setSpec>com_10324_894</setSpec><setSpec>col_10324_1262</setSpec></header><metadata><rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/rdf/" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ds="http://dspace.org/ds/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:ow="http://www.ontoweb.org/ontology/1#" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/rdf/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/rdf.xsd">
<ow:Publication rdf:about="oai:uvadoc.uva.es:10324/21498">
<dc:title>Positional Voting Systems Generated by Cumulative Standings Functions</dc:title>
<dc:creator>Llamazares Rodríguez, Bonifacio</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Peña García, María Teresa</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Voto - Matemáticas</dc:subject>
<dc:description>Producción Científica</dc:description>
<dc:description>Positional voting systems are a class of voting systems where voters rank&#xd;
order the candidates from best to worst and a set of winners is selected using the&#xd;
positions of the candidates in the voters’ preference orders. Although scoring rules&#xd;
are the best known positional voting systems, this class includes other voting systems&#xd;
proposed in the literature as, for example, the Majoritarian Compromise or the&#xd;
q-Approval Fallback Bargaining. In this paper we show that some of these positional&#xd;
voting systems can be integrated in a model based on cumulative standings functions.&#xd;
The proposed model allows us to establish a general framework for the analysis of&#xd;
these voting systems, to extend to them some results in the literature for the particular&#xd;
case of the scoring rules, and also facilitates the study of the social choice properties&#xd;
considered in the paper: monotonicity, Pareto-optimality, immunity to the absolute&#xd;
winner paradox, Condorcet consistency, immunity to the absolute loser paradox and&#xd;
immunity to the Condorcet loser paradox.</dc:description>
<dc:date>2016-12-09T12:16:00Z</dc:date>
<dc:date>2016-12-09T12:16:00Z</dc:date>
<dc:date>2015</dc:date>
<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
<dc:identifier>Group Decision and Negotiation, 2015, Vol. 24, Issue 5, pp 777–801</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>0926-2644</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>http://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/21498</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>10.1007/s10726-014-9412-8</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>777</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>5</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>801</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>Group Decision and Negotiation</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>24</dc:identifier>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dc:relation>https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10726-014-9412-8</dc:relation>
<dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
<dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/</dc:rights>
<dc:rights>Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International</dc:rights>
<dc:publisher>Springer Verlag</dc:publisher>
<dc:peerreviewed>SI</dc:peerreviewed>
</ow:Publication>
</rdf:RDF></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>