<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-04-14T15:58:42Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:uvadoc.uva.es:10324/22085" metadataPrefix="mods">https://uvadoc.uva.es/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:uvadoc.uva.es:10324/22085</identifier><datestamp>2025-02-19T08:14:30Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_10324_1133</setSpec><setSpec>com_10324_931</setSpec><setSpec>com_10324_894</setSpec><setSpec>col_10324_1209</setSpec></header><metadata><mods:mods xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-1.xsd">
<mods:name>
<mods:namePart>Ibares Frías, Lucía</mods:namePart>
</mods:name>
<mods:name>
<mods:namePart>Gallego Muñoz, Patricia</mods:namePart>
</mods:name>
<mods:name>
<mods:namePart>Cantalapiedra Rodríguez, Roberto</mods:namePart>
</mods:name>
<mods:name>
<mods:namePart>Valsero Blanco, María Cruz</mods:namePart>
</mods:name>
<mods:name>
<mods:namePart>Mar Sardaña, Santiago</mods:namePart>
</mods:name>
<mods:name>
<mods:namePart>Merayo Lloves, Jesús</mods:namePart>
</mods:name>
<mods:name>
<mods:namePart>Martínez García, María del Carmen</mods:namePart>
</mods:name>
<mods:extension>
<mods:dateAvailable encoding="iso8601">2017-01-12T09:06:22Z</mods:dateAvailable>
</mods:extension>
<mods:extension>
<mods:dateAccessioned encoding="iso8601">2017-01-12T09:06:22Z</mods:dateAccessioned>
</mods:extension>
<mods:originInfo>
<mods:dateIssued encoding="iso8601">2015</mods:dateIssued>
</mods:originInfo>
<mods:identifier type="citation">Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, (2015); 253:1071–1083</mods:identifier>
<mods:identifier type="issn">0721-832X</mods:identifier>
<mods:identifier type="uri">http://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/22085</mods:identifier>
<mods:identifier type="doi">10.1007/s00417-015-2959-5</mods:identifier>
<mods:identifier type="publicationfirstpage">1071</mods:identifier>
<mods:identifier type="publicationlastpage">1083</mods:identifier>
<mods:identifier type="publicationtitle">Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology</mods:identifier>
<mods:identifier type="publicationvolume">253</mods:identifier>
<mods:abstract>Purpose To evaluate corneal wound healing in the hen animal&#xd;
model after additive surgery with an intracorneal ring segment&#xd;
(ICRS).&#xd;
Methods We implanted one ICRS in each eye of 76 hens. In&#xd;
control group 1 (n=22 hens), the stromal channel was prepared&#xd;
but no ICRS was inserted. In control group 2 (n=2&#xd;
hens), no surgery was performed. Animals were randomly&#xd;
separated into groups and euthanized after clinical follow-up&#xd;
of 4 and 12 hours, 1, 2, 3, and 7 days, and 1, 2, 3, 4, and&#xd;
6 months. Corneas were stained with hematoxylin-eosin. Apoptosis&#xd;
was measured by terminal uridine nick end-labeling&#xd;
assays. Cell proliferation and myofibroblast-like differentiation&#xd;
were assayed by BrdU and α-smooth muscle actin immunofluorescence&#xd;
microscopy. Stromal matrix changes were&#xd;
documented by electron microscopy.&#xd;
Results Epithelial and stromal cell apoptosis around the&#xd;
ICRS-implanted and control group 1 eyes peaked at&#xd;
12 hours, but continued for 72 hours. In ICRSimplanted&#xd;
eyes, epithelial and stromal proliferation was&#xd;
present at 12 and 24 hours, respectively, and peaked at&#xd;
7 days and 72 hours, respectively. Some proliferation in&#xd;
the ICRS-implanted group continued through the 6-&#xd;
month follow-up, and myofibroblast-like cells differentiated&#xd;
one to three months after ICRS implantation. The&#xd;
segments rotated within the stroma as the limbal inferior&#xd;
angle approached the epithelium.&#xd;
Conclusions Wound healing after ICRS implantation in hen&#xd;
corneas was similar to that of other corneal surgical wounds in&#xd;
stages. However, there were some specific features related to&#xd;
the small size of the epithelial wound and the device permanently&#xd;
implanted inside the cornea.</mods:abstract>
<mods:language>
<mods:languageTerm>eng</mods:languageTerm>
</mods:language>
<mods:accessCondition type="useAndReproduction">info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</mods:accessCondition>
<mods:accessCondition type="useAndReproduction">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/</mods:accessCondition>
<mods:accessCondition type="useAndReproduction">Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International</mods:accessCondition>
<mods:subject>
<mods:topic>Gallinas - Ensayos técnicos</mods:topic>
</mods:subject>
<mods:subject>
<mods:topic>Córnea - Cirugía</mods:topic>
</mods:subject>
<mods:titleInfo>
<mods:title>Tissue reaction after intrastromal corneal ring implantation in an experimental animal model</mods:title>
</mods:titleInfo>
<mods:genre>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</mods:genre>
</mods:mods></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>