2026-04-14T17:29:43Zhttps://uvadoc.uva.es/oai/request

oai:uvadoc.uva.es:10324/286552022-06-28T07:59:48Zcom_10324_1168com_10324_931com_10324_894col_10324_1302

Touati, Khaled Tadeo Rico, Fernando Juan 2018-02-21T12:22:04Z 2018-02-21T12:22:04Z 2017 Energy, 132, 213-224. http://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/28655 10.1016/j.energy.2017.05.050 213 132 224 Energy The integration of Pressure Retarded Osmosis (PRO) with Seawater Reverse Osmosis (SWRO) is studied here, concentrating on the effect on the overall energy consumption and on the effluents. For this, two alternative designs are evaluated: a previously studied one-stage PRO (SWRO-1PRO) and a newly proposed two-stage PRO (SWRO-2PRO). The analysis results obtained from extrapolation of laboratory data using models show better performance for SWRO-2PRO (without using external impaired low-salinity water flows). The improvement of performance thanks to PRO increases with the increase of the feed concentration and flow. eng info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Elsevier Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Osmotic energy recovery from Reverse Osmosis using two-stage Pressure Retarded Osmosis. info:eu-repo/semantics/article