<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-04-27T12:35:04Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:uvadoc.uva.es:10324/34121" metadataPrefix="rdf">https://uvadoc.uva.es/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:uvadoc.uva.es:10324/34121</identifier><datestamp>2025-03-26T19:10:03Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_10324_1146</setSpec><setSpec>com_10324_931</setSpec><setSpec>com_10324_894</setSpec><setSpec>col_10324_1262</setSpec></header><metadata><rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/rdf/" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ds="http://dspace.org/ds/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:ow="http://www.ontoweb.org/ontology/1#" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/rdf/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/rdf.xsd">
<ow:Publication rdf:about="oai:uvadoc.uva.es:10324/34121">
<dc:title>Optimal environmental policy for a polluting monopoly with abatement costs: Taxes versus standards</dc:title>
<dc:creator>Martín Herrán, Guiomar</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Rubio, Santiago</dc:creator>
<dc:description>Producción Científica</dc:description>
<dc:description>In this paper, we characterize the optimal environmental policy for a polluting monopoly that devotes resources to abatement&#xd;
activities when damages are caused by a stock pollutant. With this aim, we calculate the stagewise feedback Stackelberg&#xd;
equilibrium of a (differential) policy game where the regulator is the leader and the monopolist is the follower. Our analysis&#xd;
shows that the first-best policy consists of applying a Pigouvian tax and a subsidy on production equal to the difference&#xd;
between the price and the marginal revenue. However, for a stock pollutant, the Pigouvian tax is not equal to the marginal&#xd;
damages but is given by the difference between the social and private valuation of the pollution stock. On the other hand,&#xd;
if a second-best emission tax is used, the tax is lower than the Pigouvian tax and the difference decreases with the price&#xd;
elasticity of the demand. Finally, we find that taxes and standards are equivalent in a second-best setting. In the second part&#xd;
of the paper, we solve a linear-quadratic differential game and we obtain that the first-best tax increases with the pollution&#xd;
stock whereas the subsidy decreases. Moreover, the tax is negative for low values of the pollution stock, i.e., for low values&#xd;
of the pollution stock, we obtain that the social valuation of the stock is lower than the private valuation. Furthermore, when&#xd;
a second-best policy is applied, the steady-state pollution stock is lower than the steady-state pollution stock associated with&#xd;
the efficient outcome.</dc:description>
<dc:date>2019-01-21T10:02:37Z</dc:date>
<dc:date>2019-01-21T10:02:37Z</dc:date>
<dc:date>2018</dc:date>
<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
<dc:identifier>Environmental Modelling &amp; Assessment, 2018, vol. 23, n. 6. p.  671-689</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>http://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/34121</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>10.1007/s10666-018-9602-x</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>671</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>689</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>Environmental Modelling &amp; Assessment</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>23</dc:identifier>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
<dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/</dc:rights>
<dc:rights>Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International</dc:rights>
<dc:peerreviewed>SI</dc:peerreviewed>
</ow:Publication>
</rdf:RDF></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>