2026-04-14T17:02:54Zhttps://uvadoc.uva.es/oai/request

oai:uvadoc.uva.es:10324/354412022-09-27T13:28:34Zcom_10324_5466com_10324_5186com_10324_29291col_10324_5492

Giner Soria, María Concepción 2019-04-24T18:06:45Z 2019-04-24T18:06:45Z 1995 Minerva. Revista de Filología Clásica; Núm. 9 (1995) pags. 79-95 2530-6480 http://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/35441 79 9 95 The term diálexis, existent from the end of the first century, can denote a brief discourse, an essay, a short spoken piece dealing with a wide range of subjects or even an introductory part of a larger discourse. Many of the best Greek orators of the Second Sophistic made use of this pleasant genre. However, this rhetorical variation has not attracted the attention of present day scholars, since so few of them remain. Philostratus, in his Vitae Sophistarum, makes quite a few references to dialéxeis written by various sophists. It is very likely that he, too, favoured this rhetorical genre. We shall study a diálexis that was probably written and declaimed by the second Philostratus. spa info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Filología clásica Acotaciones a una breve diálexis info:eu-repo/semantics/article