2026-05-05T19:46:15Zhttps://uvadoc.uva.es/oai/request

oai:uvadoc.uva.es:10324/354682022-09-27T13:28:34Zcom_10324_5466com_10324_5186com_10324_29291col_10324_5490

Viciano, Albert Ediciones Universidad de Valladolid 2019-04-24T18:12:11Z 2019-04-24T18:12:11Z 1996 Minerva. Revista de Filología Clásica; Núm. 10 (1996) pags. 87-104 2530-6480 http://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/35468 87 10 104 The Latin grammarians of Late Antiquity denied that the article belonged to a separate class of Latin words. They recognized, however, that one of the syntactical functions of the pronomen was denominated articulare pronomen or articulus (e.g. hic magister, hic sacerdos, haec sacerdos). A pointed discussion arose among grammarians regarding the syntactical function of the articulus when it preceded indefinite pronouns such as alter, alius; in these cases, some held, the pronouns turned into nouns, inasmuch as they ceased to be indefinite upon being preceded by a definite article (e.g. hic alter, hic alius). Priscian supplies light to appreciate the importance of the discrepancies among grammarians in their debate over the syntactical functions of Latin pronouns. application/pdf spa info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Minerva. Revista de Filología Clásica Filología clásica El articulus en los gramáticos latinos info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion https://revistas.uva.es/index.php/minerva/article/view/3048