2026-04-14T19:50:00Zhttp://uvadoc.uva.es/oai/request

oai:uvadoc.uva.es:10324/354722022-09-27T13:28:34Zcom_10324_5466com_10324_5186com_10324_29291col_10324_5489

Valdés Gallego, José Antonio 2019-04-24T18:15:22Z 2019-04-24T18:15:22Z 1997 Minerva. Revista de Filología Clásica; Núm. 11 (1997) pags. 139-156 2530-6480 http://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/35472 139 11 156 Authenticity or falseness of notarial documents from Middle Ages wasn't usually infered by Philologists but by Historians. In this paper I suggest a philological method about that question. However, I recognize that this view would only be complementary of others. The stages of a philological survey about authenticity could be the following ones: l. A summary of informations from historical studies. 2. A philological and linguistic survey (a search of interpolations; a statement of linguistic characteristics related to the text; a comparison with an external control that is reliable). 3. A final comparison of the conclusions with the previous ones. As examples of the method, I offer the transcription and investigation of copies from two royal diplomas incorporated into the most important manuscript preserved in the Cathedral Archive of Oviedo: the Liber Testamentorum, from XII Century. spa info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Filología clásica La detección filológica de adulteraciones en diplomas medievales info:eu-repo/semantics/article