<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-04-14T19:21:14Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:uvadoc.uva.es:10324/36090" metadataPrefix="marc">https://uvadoc.uva.es/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:uvadoc.uva.es:10324/36090</identifier><datestamp>2025-03-26T19:10:03Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_10324_1146</setSpec><setSpec>com_10324_931</setSpec><setSpec>com_10324_894</setSpec><setSpec>col_10324_1262</setSpec></header><metadata><record xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd">
<leader>00925njm 22002777a 4500</leader>
<datafield tag="042" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">dc</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="720" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">García Lapresta, José Luis</subfield>
<subfield code="e">author</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="720" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">González del Pozo, Raquel</subfield>
<subfield code="e">author</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="c">2019</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">Many decision-making problems such as quality control analysis, market surveys&#xd;
or sensory analysis require ordered qualitative scales, rather than numerical&#xd;
ones. It is very common to assign some cardinal mathematical objects, such as&#xd;
numerical values, intervals of real numbers or fuzzy numbers, to the linguistic&#xd;
terms of ordered qualitative scales. However, when agents perceive that the&#xd;
psychological proximity between each pair of consecutive terms of the scale is&#xd;
not identical, these conversions are meaningless and an ordinal approach to deal&#xd;
with these non-uniform ordered qualitative scales is more appropriate. The aim&#xd;
of this paper is to introduce an ordinal multi-criteria decision-making procedure&#xd;
for ranking alternatives in the setting of ordered qualitative scales that are nonnecessarily&#xd;
uniform. The possibility of doubt is also considered, by allowing&#xd;
agents to assign two consecutive terms of the scale when they hesitate. The&#xd;
proposed procedure is applied to a real case study in which nine experts assessed&#xd;
eight wines regarding different criteria.</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="024" ind2=" " ind1="8">
<subfield code="a">European Journal of Operational Research, 2019,&#xd;
Volume 279, Issue 1, Pages 159-167</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="024" ind2=" " ind1="8">
<subfield code="a">0377-2217</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="024" ind2=" " ind1="8">
<subfield code="a">http://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/36090</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="024" ind2=" " ind1="8">
<subfield code="a">10.1016/j.ejor.2019.05.015</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
<subfield code="a">An ordinal multi-criteria decision-making procedure under imprecise linguistic assessments</subfield>
</datafield>
</record></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>