2026-04-27T21:53:18Zhttps://uvadoc.uva.es/oai/request

oai:uvadoc.uva.es:10324/379422021-09-21T12:41:18Zcom_10324_1146com_10324_931com_10324_894col_10324_1262

Llamazares Rodríguez, Bonifacio Pérez Asurmendi, Patrizia García Lapresta, José Luis 2019-09-14T10:19:05Z 2019-09-14T10:19:05Z 2013 Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2013, vol. 216, p. 3-15. 0165-0114 http://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/37942 10.1016/j.fss.2012.04.015 3 15 Fuzzy Sets and Systems 216 A common criticism to simple majority voting rule is the slight support that such rule demands to declare an alternative as a winner. Among the distinct majority rules used for diminishing this handicap, we focus on majorities based on difference in support. With these majorities, voters are allowed to show intensities of preference among alternatives through reciprocal preference relations. These majorities also take into account the difference in support between alternatives in order to select the winner. In this paper we have provided some necessary and sufficient conditions for ensuring transitive collective decisions generated by majorities based on difference in support for all the profiles of individual reciprocal preference relations. These conditions involve both the thresholds of support and some individual rationality assumptions that are related to transitivity in the framework of reciprocal preference relations. eng info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Collective transitivity in majorities based on difference in support info:eu-repo/semantics/article