2026-05-05T11:17:49Zhttps://uvadoc.uva.es/oai/request

oai:uvadoc.uva.es:10324/443802021-06-23T10:14:13Zcom_10324_1156com_10324_931com_10324_894col_10324_1294

Corredor Lanas, María Cristina 2020-12-16T08:15:55Z 2020-12-16T08:15:55Z 2018 Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric: The Philosophy of Argumentation, Vol. 55 (68), Nº 1, 2018, pp. 11-29 0860-150X http://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/44380 10.2478/slgr-2018-0026 11 1 29 Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 55 2199-6059 Producción Científica Discursive theories of justice have been questioned for putting forward high-level principles that should nevertheless play a role in practical discourses in which the justice of a claim is at stake. Here, I will critically examine and systematize the main tenets in Rawls’s and Habermas’s discursive theories, and will suggest that the principles of justice (Rawls) and universalization (Habermas) can and play the role of mandates of optimalization in real deliberations on justice. application/pdf eng University of Bialystok info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ © University of Bialystok Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional Discursive theories Principles of justice Principle of universalization Deliberation Rawls Habermas 56 Ciencias Jurídicas y Derecho Norms in deliberation: The role of the principles of justice and universalization in practical discourses on the justice of norms info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion https://content.sciendo.com/view/journals/slgr/55/1/article-p11.xml SI