<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-05-05T18:28:51Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:uvadoc.uva.es:10324/45629" metadataPrefix="qdc">https://uvadoc.uva.es/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:uvadoc.uva.es:10324/45629</identifier><datestamp>2021-06-24T07:26:20Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_10324_41462</setSpec><setSpec>com_10324_954</setSpec><setSpec>com_10324_894</setSpec><setSpec>col_10324_41463</setSpec></header><metadata><qdc:qualifieddc xmlns:qdc="http://dspace.org/qualifieddc/" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/qdc/2006/01/06/dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/terms/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/qdc/2006/01/06/dcterms.xsd http://dspace.org/qualifieddc/ http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/metadata/dcmi/xmlschema/qualifieddc.xsd">
<dc:title>Evaluation of Group B Streptococcus Differential Agar for detection and isolation of Streptococcus agalactiae</dc:title>
<dc:creator>Bou, German</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Figueira, M.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Canle, Delia</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Cartelle, Mónica</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Eiros Bouza, José María</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Villanueva, Rosa</dc:creator>
<dcterms:abstract>Abstract&#xd;
&#xd;
In total, 320 vaginal or rectal swabs were cultured on Granada medium (GM) or Group B Streptococcus Differential Agar (GBSDA), and were also inoculated into LIM broth (Todd–Hewitt broth supplemented with selective antibiotics), for detection of group B Streptococcus (GBS). Overall, GBS isolates were detected on 53 of the 320 swabs; 47 of these isolates grew on both GM and GBSDA, five only on GBSDA, and one only following subculture from LIM broth. GBSDA appears to be a valid alternative to GM for the growth of GBS isolates from pregnant women.</dcterms:abstract>
<dcterms:dateAccepted>2021-03-10T11:59:42Z</dcterms:dateAccepted>
<dcterms:available>2021-03-10T11:59:42Z</dcterms:available>
<dcterms:created>2021-03-10T11:59:42Z</dcterms:created>
<dcterms:issued>2005</dcterms:issued>
<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
<dc:identifier>Clinical Microbiology and Infection, 2005, vol. 11, n. 8, p. 676-678</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>1198-743X</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>http://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/45629</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>10.1111/j.1469-0691.2005.01195.x</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>676</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>8</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>678</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>Clinical Microbiology and Infection</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>11</dc:identifier>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dc:relation>https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1198743X14624253?via%3Dihub</dc:relation>
<dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
<dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/</dc:rights>
<dc:rights>© Elsevier</dc:rights>
<dc:rights>Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional</dc:rights>
<dc:publisher>Elsevier</dc:publisher>
</qdc:qualifieddc></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>