2026-04-27T21:42:43Zhttps://uvadoc.uva.es/oai/request

oai:uvadoc.uva.es:10324/485002021-09-02T20:47:03Zcom_10324_1156com_10324_931com_10324_894col_10324_1294

Marcos Martínez, Alfredo Faustino 2021-09-02T12:03:10Z 2021-09-02T12:03:10Z 2021 Axiomathes, 2021 1122-1151 https://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/48500 10.1007/s10516-021-09574-3 Axiomathes 1572-8390 Producción Científica In this article, I argue that there is philosophy of science since philosophy existed. Thus, the idea that the philosophy of science was born with neopositivism is histori cally wrong and detrimental to the development of the philosophy of science itself. Neopositivism tried to found the philosophy of science as an anti-philosophical dis cipline, as a feld of study that came to replace simple philosophy. The attempt was maintained for thirty years, but failed. Now, this does not mean that we cannot make good philosophy of science today, but that the philosophy of science has returned to the common house of philosophy, it is gradually recovering the connection that it should never have lost with the main philosophical traditions and disciplines application/pdf eng Springer info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ © 2021 The Authors Atribución 4.0 Internacional Neopositivismo Neopositivism Philosophical traditions Tradiciones filosóficas Origin of the philosophy of science Origen de la filosofía de la ciencia 72 Filosofía Philosophy of science and philosophy: The long flight home info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10516-021-09574-3 SI