<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-05-05T21:30:16Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:uvadoc.uva.es:10324/50380" metadataPrefix="dim">https://uvadoc.uva.es/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:uvadoc.uva.es:10324/50380</identifier><datestamp>2025-02-11T18:06:37Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_10324_1156</setSpec><setSpec>com_10324_931</setSpec><setSpec>com_10324_894</setSpec><setSpec>col_10324_1294</setSpec></header><metadata><dim:dim xmlns:dim="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim http://www.dspace.org/schema/dim.xsd">
<dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="author" authority="9f40e4e296dc46d6" confidence="600" orcid_id="0000-0003-2979-6631">Bello Hutt, Donald Emerson</dim:field>
<dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="accessioned">2021-11-18T09:36:54Z</dim:field>
<dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="available">2021-11-18T09:36:54Z</dim:field>
<dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="issued">2021</dim:field>
<dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="citation" lang="es">Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 2021.</dim:field>
<dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="issn" lang="es">1876-4045</dim:field>
<dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="uri">https://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/50380</dim:field>
<dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="doi" lang="es">10.1007/s40803-021-00163-5</dim:field>
<dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="publicationtitle" lang="es">Hague Journal on the Rule of Law</dim:field>
<dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="essn" lang="es">1876-4053</dim:field>
<dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="es">Producción Científica</dim:field>
<dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="abstract" lang="es">How do the rule of law and political representation relate to each other? I answer &#xd;
this question, hitherto neglected by rule-of-law scholars, taking my cue from Joseph &#xd;
Raz’s revision of his conception of the rule of law and by relying on a distinction &#xd;
between preferences and interests, which pervades discussions of political represen tation. I argue that political representatives’ attention to their constituents’ prefer ences, and not just their interests, is a necessary feature of a conception of represen tation that expresses a robust allegiance to the rule of law. More specifcally, that &#xd;
such allegiance is better honoured when representatives are responsive to prefer ences warranted by public interests. I ofer two groups of rule-of-law reasons for &#xd;
that claim. First, because respect for preferences by representatives facilitates the &#xd;
conditions for the law to be obeyed. Second, respect for those preferences through &#xd;
the justifcation of the representatives’ collective decisions allows for accountability &#xd;
and for non-arbitrary creation and application of the law. I fnish addressing a three fold objection to my reliance on preferences as objects that representatives should &#xd;
consider when making their decisions</dim:field>
<dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="project">Publicación en abierto financiada por el Consorcio de Bibliotecas Universitarias de Castilla y León (BUCLE), con cargo al Programa Operativo 2014ES16RFOP009 FEDER 2014-2020 DE CASTILLA Y LEÓN, Actuación:20007-CL - Apoyo Consorcio BUCLE</dim:field>
<dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="mimetype" lang="es">application/pdf</dim:field>
<dim:field mdschema="dc" element="language" qualifier="iso" lang="es">eng</dim:field>
<dim:field mdschema="dc" element="publisher" lang="es">Springer</dim:field>
<dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights" qualifier="accessRights" lang="es">info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dim:field>
<dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights" qualifier="uri" lang="*">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</dim:field>
<dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights" qualifier="holder" lang="es">© 2021 The Authors</dim:field>
<dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights" lang="*">Atribución 4.0 Internacional</dim:field>
<dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" qualifier="classification" lang="es">Rule of law</dim:field>
<dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" qualifier="classification" lang="es">Representation</dim:field>
<dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" qualifier="classification" lang="es">Preferences</dim:field>
<dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" qualifier="classification" lang="es">Public interests</dim:field>
<dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" qualifier="classification" lang="es">Constitutionalism</dim:field>
<dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" qualifier="unesco" lang="es">72 Filosofía</dim:field>
<dim:field mdschema="dc" element="title" lang="es">Rule of Law and Political Representation</dim:field>
<dim:field mdschema="dc" element="type" lang="es">info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dim:field>
<dim:field mdschema="dc" element="type" qualifier="hasVersion" lang="es">info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dim:field>
<dim:field mdschema="dc" element="relation" qualifier="publisherversion" lang="es">https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40803-021-00163-5</dim:field>
<dim:field mdschema="dc" element="peerreviewed" lang="es">SI</dim:field>
</dim:dim></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>