2026-04-27T13:01:27Zhttps://uvadoc.uva.es/oai/request

oai:uvadoc.uva.es:10324/62892021-06-23T09:55:18Zcom_10324_1138com_10324_931com_10324_894col_10324_1226

Kammerlander, C. Doshi, H. Gebhard, F. Scola, A. Meier, C. Linhart, W. García Alonso, Manuel Francisco Nistal Rodríguez, Francisco Javier Blauth, M. 2014-09-26T16:50:24Z 2014-09-26T16:50:24Z 2013 Archives of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, 2013, p. 1-7 0936-8051 http://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/6289 10.1007/s00402-013-1902-7 1 7 Archives of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery Pertrochanteric fractures are increasing and their operative treatment remains under discussion. Failures needing reoperations such as a cut-out are reported to be high and are associated with multiple factors including poor bone quality, poor fracture reduction and improper implant placement. The PFNA® with perforated blade offers an option for standardized cement augmentation with a PMMA cement to provide more stability to the fracture fixation. It remains unclear if the augmentation of this implant does any harm in a longer time span. This prospective multicenter study shows clinical and radiological results with this implant with a mean follow-up time of 15 months. eng info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Huesos - Fracturas - Tratamiento Long‑term results of the augmented PFNA: a prospective multicenter trial info:eu-repo/semantics/article