2026-05-05T18:46:25Zhttps://uvadoc.uva.es/oai/request

oai:uvadoc.uva.es:10324/645652025-02-21T08:56:03Zcom_10324_1184com_10324_931com_10324_894col_10324_1400

2024-01-16T06:35:01Z urn:hdl:10324/64565 Time to Change’s social marketing campaign for a new target population: results from 2017 to 2019 González Sanguino, Teresa Clara Potts, Laura C. Milenova, Maria Henderson, Claire Background: Since 2009 Time to Change has included among its strategies a social marketing campaign to tackle the stigma surrounding mental health problems. At the start of its third phase (2016–2021) the target group of the campaign was kept as people aged between mid-twenties and mid-forties but changed to middle-low income groups and the content was focused on men. Methods: Participants (n = 3700) were recruited through an online market research panel, before and after each burst of the campaign. They completed an online questionnaire evaluating knowledge (Mental Health Knowledge Schedule, MAKS); attitudes (Community Attitudes toward Mental Illness, CAMI); and desire for social distance (Intended Behaviour subscale of the Reported and Intended Behaviour Scale, RIBS). Socio-demographic data and awareness of the campaign were also collected. Results: For each of the 3 bursts, significant pre-post awareness differences were found (OR = 2.83, CI = 1.90–4.20, p < 0.001; OR = 1.72, CI = 1.22–2.42, p = 0.002; OR = 1.41, CI = 1.01–1.97, p = 0.043), and awareness at the end of the third burst was 33%. Demographic factors associated with awareness for one or more bursts included having children, familiarity with mental illness, male sex, being Black, Asian or other ethnic minorities and living in London or the East Midlands regions. An improvement across bursts in the “living with” subscale item of the RIBS, and in the “recover” and “advice to a friend” MAKS items were found. Familiarity with mental illness had the strongest association with all outcome measures, while the awareness of the campaign was also related with higher scores in MAKS and RIBS. Conclusions: These interim results suggest that the campaign is reaching and having an impact on its new target audience to a similar extent as did the TTC phase 1 campaign. While over the course of TTC we have found no evidence that demographic differences in stigma have widened, and indeed those by age group and region of England have narrowed, those for socioeconomic status, ethnicity and sex have so far remained unchanged. By targeting a lower socioeconomic group and creating relatively greater awareness among men and in Black and ethnic minority groups, the campaign is showing the potential to address these persistent differences in stigma 2024-01-16T06:35:01Z 2024-01-16T06:35:01Z 2019 info:eu-repo/semantics/article González-Sanguino, C., Potts, L. C., Milenova, M., & Henderson, C. (2019). Time to Change’s social marketing campaign for a new target population: results from 2017 to 2019. BMC psychiatry, 19, 1-11. 10.1186/s12888-019-2415-x https://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/64565 10.1186/s12888-019-2415-x 1 BMC Psychiatry 19 1471-244X spa info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess