2026-05-05T12:30:22Zhttps://uvadoc.uva.es/oai/request

oai:uvadoc.uva.es:10324/660982025-03-26T16:41:30Zcom_10324_1156com_10324_931com_10324_894col_10324_1294

Caamaño Alegre, María de la Concepción 2024-02-09T13:17:33Z 2024-02-09T13:17:33Z 2019 3) “From Ontological Traits to Validity Challenges in Social Science: The Cases of Economic Experiments and Research Questionnaires” (co-authored with José Caamaño Alegre), International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 32, n. 2, 2019, pp.101-127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02698595.2019.1682773 https://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/66098 10.1080/02698595.2019.1682773 This article examines how problems of validity in empirical social research differ from those in natural science. Specifically, we focus on how some ontological peculiarities of the object of study in social science bear on validity requirements. We consider these issues in experimental validity as well as in test validity because, while both fields hold large intellectual traditions, research tests or questionnaires are less closely connected to natural science methodology than experiments. eng info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess 3) “From Ontological Traits to Validity Challenges in Social Science: The Cases of Economic Experiments and Research Questionnaires” info:eu-repo/semantics/article