<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-05-05T11:25:55Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:uvadoc.uva.es:10324/73939" metadataPrefix="dim">https://uvadoc.uva.es/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:uvadoc.uva.es:10324/73939</identifier><datestamp>2025-01-16T20:03:20Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_10324_38</setSpec><setSpec>col_10324_852</setSpec></header><metadata><dim:dim xmlns:dim="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim http://www.dspace.org/schema/dim.xsd">
<dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="advisor" lang="es" authority="a4a135bb67963703" confidence="600" orcid_id="">Macera Tiragallo, Bernard Frank</dim:field>
<dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="author" authority="793a1736-5410-4848-84d3-2e4dbe1067a2" confidence="600" orcid_id="">Río de Castro, Irene del</dim:field>
<dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="editor" lang="es" authority="EDUVA51" confidence="600" orcid_id="">Universidad de Valladolid. Facultad de Derecho</dim:field>
<dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="accessioned">2025-01-16T11:46:23Z</dim:field>
<dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="available">2025-01-16T11:46:23Z</dim:field>
<dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="issued">2024</dim:field>
<dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="uri">https://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/73939</dim:field>
<dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="abstract" lang="es">El recurso de casación es un recurso de carácter extraordinario que suele&#xd;
presentarse ante la Sala de lo Contencioso-Administrativo del Tribunal Supremo y suele&#xd;
exigir la unificación doctrinal de éste en cuanto a un determinado tema.&#xd;
Sin embargo, desde la reforma de la Ley Orgánica 7/2015, de 21 de julio, por la que&#xd;
se modifica la Ley Orgánica 6/1985, del Poder Judicial (LOPJ), la doctrina jurídica&#xd;
considera que existe escasa seguridad jurídica alrededor de este recurso en virtud del&#xd;
denominado por la Ley 29/1998, de 13 de julio, reguladora de la Jurisdicción Contencioso-&#xd;
Administrativa “interés casacional objetivo”, que complica en gran medida la correcta&#xd;
aplicación de este recurso al ser un concepto jurídico indeterminado.&#xd;
En este estudio, se va a intentar analizar el alcance de la objetividad del interés&#xd;
casacional, y más concretamente el límite entre la subjetividad y la objetividad que posee el&#xd;
Tribunal Supremo al juzgar este tipo de recursos cuando llegan a su haber mediante una&#xd;
revisión sistemática de la ley que permita apreciar el tipo de recurso en concreto y&#xd;
determinar su objetividad o subjetividad, según se considere.</dim:field>
<dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="abstract" lang="es">Cassation appeal is an extraordinary appeal usually filed at the Supreme Courts&#xd;
Contentious Administrative Chamber and usually requires the Supreme Court to único its&#xd;
doctrine on a specific issue.&#xd;
However, since the reform of Organic Law 7/2015, of 21 July, which amends&#xd;
Organic Law 6/1985 on the Judiciary (LOPJ), the legal doctrine considers that there’s little&#xd;
legal certainty surrounding this appeal by virtue of what is known by Law 29/1998, of 13&#xd;
July, regulating the Contentious-Administrative Jurisdiction as the "objective interest of&#xd;
appeal", which greatly complicates the correct application of this type of appeal as it is an&#xd;
indeterminate legal concept.&#xd;
In this study, an attempt will be made to analyse the scope of the objectivity of the&#xd;
appeal, and more specifically, the limit between subjectivity and objectivity that the&#xd;
Supreme Court possesses when judging this type of appeal when it reaches its jurisdiction&#xd;
through a sistematic revision which may allow to aprreciate this type of appealing&#xd;
especifically and get to know if it’s an objective or subjetcive appeal, as it ‘ll be considered</dim:field>
<dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="sponsorship" lang="es">Departamento de Derecho Público</dim:field>
<dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="degree" lang="es">Grado en Derecho</dim:field>
<dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="mimetype" lang="es">application/pdf</dim:field>
<dim:field mdschema="dc" element="language" qualifier="iso" lang="es">spa</dim:field>
<dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights" qualifier="accessRights" lang="es">info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dim:field>
<dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights" qualifier="uri" lang="*">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/</dim:field>
<dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights" lang="*">Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional</dim:field>
<dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" qualifier="classification" lang="es">Recurso casación</dim:field>
<dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" qualifier="classification" lang="es">Proceso contencioso-administrativo</dim:field>
<dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" qualifier="classification" lang="es">Subjetividad</dim:field>
<dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" qualifier="unesco" lang="es">56 Ciencias Jurídicas y Derecho</dim:field>
<dim:field mdschema="dc" element="title" lang="es">El recurso de casación y su aparente subjetividad</dim:field>
<dim:field mdschema="dc" element="type" lang="es">info:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis</dim:field>
</dim:dim></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>