<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-04-14T17:29:22Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:uvadoc.uva.es:10324/75224" metadataPrefix="mods">https://uvadoc.uva.es/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:uvadoc.uva.es:10324/75224</identifier><datestamp>2025-03-07T08:41:18Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_10324_1181</setSpec><setSpec>com_10324_931</setSpec><setSpec>com_10324_894</setSpec><setSpec>col_10324_1387</setSpec></header><metadata><mods:mods xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-1.xsd">
<mods:name>
<mods:namePart>Ruiz Pérez, Esther</mods:namePart>
</mods:name>
<mods:name>
<mods:namePart>Miguel Manso, María Sonia de</mods:namePart>
</mods:name>
<mods:name>
<mods:namePart>García García, Elena</mods:namePart>
</mods:name>
<mods:name>
<mods:namePart>Gobernado Tejedor, Julio Alberto</mods:namePart>
</mods:name>
<mods:name>
<mods:namePart>Sanz Díaz-Heredero, Álvaro</mods:namePart>
</mods:name>
<mods:name>
<mods:namePart>Casamayor Del Nogal, Lidia</mods:namePart>
</mods:name>
<mods:name>
<mods:namePart>Canales Martínez, Sandra</mods:namePart>
</mods:name>
<mods:name>
<mods:namePart>Bayón Pascual, Jimena</mods:namePart>
</mods:name>
<mods:extension>
<mods:dateAvailable encoding="iso8601">2025-03-04T12:59:07Z</mods:dateAvailable>
</mods:extension>
<mods:extension>
<mods:dateAccessioned encoding="iso8601">2025-03-04T12:59:07Z</mods:dateAccessioned>
</mods:extension>
<mods:originInfo>
<mods:dateIssued encoding="iso8601">2024</mods:dateIssued>
</mods:originInfo>
<mods:identifier type="citation">Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2024, vol. 310, n. 5, p. 2697-2710</mods:identifier>
<mods:identifier type="uri">https://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/75224</mods:identifier>
<mods:identifier type="doi">10.1007/s00404-024-07691-z</mods:identifier>
<mods:identifier type="publicationfirstpage">2697</mods:identifier>
<mods:identifier type="publicationissue">5</mods:identifier>
<mods:identifier type="publicationlastpage">2703</mods:identifier>
<mods:identifier type="publicationtitle">Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics</mods:identifier>
<mods:identifier type="publicationvolume">310</mods:identifier>
<mods:identifier type="essn">1432-0711</mods:identifier>
<mods:abstract>Introduction Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is a highly prevalent condition that affects between 20 and 50% of the female&#xd;
population. Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) can coexist with SUI and both can be addressed through a vaginal approach. How-&#xd;
ever, it is unclear whether simultaneous surgery for these two conditions can influence the outcome of incontinence treatment.&#xd;
Objective To evaluate the objective and subjective effectiveness of the transobturator suburethral (TO) band by comparing&#xd;
two groups: group A, of patients undergoing surgery for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) by insertion of TO mesh, and group&#xd;
B, formed for patients requiring simultaneous correction of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) in addition to TO mesh insertion.&#xd;
Materials and methods This is an observational, descriptive and retrospective study in which 91 patients participated: 33&#xd;
(group A) underwent surgery for SUI and 58 (group B) underwent corrective surgery for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and&#xd;
TO band simultaneously.&#xd;
Variables included: total urinary continence, objective urinary continence, subjective urinary continence (satisfaction levels&#xd;
and two validated questionnaires (PGI-1 and ICIQ-SF)) and complications.&#xd;
Results Regarding total continence, from the seventh to the ninth year, statistically significant differences were observed,&#xd;
with total continence being higher in group A. Objective continence decreased in both groups during the follow-up period.&#xd;
No significant differences were found between the two groups regarding subjective urinary continence (ICIQ-SF) and the&#xd;
degree of improvement after surgical treatment (PGI-1). The level of satisfaction after surgery was high in both groups.&#xd;
Regarding complications, there were no statistically significant differences.&#xd;
Conclusions Isolated surgery for SUI could be considered more effective in achieving total and objective continence. How-&#xd;
ever, the insertion of the TO band in both cases improves subjective urinary continence and quality of life with great safety&#xd;
and without differences regarding complications.</mods:abstract>
<mods:language>
<mods:languageTerm>eng</mods:languageTerm>
</mods:language>
<mods:accessCondition type="useAndReproduction">info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</mods:accessCondition>
<mods:accessCondition type="useAndReproduction">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</mods:accessCondition>
<mods:accessCondition type="useAndReproduction">© 2024 The Author(s)</mods:accessCondition>
<mods:accessCondition type="useAndReproduction">Atribución 4.0 Internacional</mods:accessCondition>
<mods:titleInfo>
<mods:title>Comparative analysis of the efficacy and complications of mid-urethral slings when inserted either in isolation or in conjunction with pelvic organ prolapse surgery</mods:title>
</mods:titleInfo>
<mods:genre>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</mods:genre>
</mods:mods></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>