2026-05-05T18:41:40Zhttps://uvadoc.uva.es/oai/request

oai:uvadoc.uva.es:10324/769382025-12-03T07:37:34Zcom_10324_1689com_10324_954com_10324_894col_10324_1690

Effects of different types of artificial light on the phytochemicals of Lactuca sativa L. Variety Great Lakes 118 cultivated under aeroponic system Lozano Castellanos, Luisa Fernanda Sánchez Hernández, Eva Navas Gracia, Luis Manuel Martín Ramos, Pablo Correa Guimaraes, Adriana Lettuce LED lighting Indoor agriculture Soilless system Secondary metabolites 31 Ciencias Agrarias Producción Científica Lettuce is extensively researched in artificial lighting systems due to its efficient growth and phytochemical composition influenced by different spectra photon flux. This research focuses on the Great Lakes 118 variety and addresses the impact of white-blue (WB), white-red-far-red (WRI), and blue-red-far-red (BRI) light treatments in aeroponic systems. Digital foliar area, transmittance, and fluorescence measurements were completed with lettuce leaf hydromethanolic extract characterization using infrared and gas chromatography-mass spectroscopy (GC-MS). Results showed significant effects on physiological parameters of nitrogen balance index (NBI), chlo- rophyll (CHL), and anthocyanin (ANTH) contents. WB led to 63.3% and 21.2% higher NBI and CHL than BRI treatment, while WRI showed similar percentages concerning BRI. WB and WRI showed 17.9% and 38.8% upper ANTH contents than BRI. On the other hand, flavonoids (FLAV) did not indicate significant treatment-dependent. BRI exhibited several positive correlations among physiological parameters, suggesting its contribution to improved plant development. Infrared analysis revealed similarities in functional groups between treatments, although WB presented a more significant peak in their infrared spectra. GC-MS evidenced differences in the phytochemical profiles, with 2-imidazolidinethione, guanazine, and 3-ethyl-2,2-dimethyl-oxazolidine being the most abundant compounds in WRI, BRI, and WB-treated plants, respectively. The reported findings suggest that BRI may be the preferred artificial irradiation option. This work was supported by the European Union through the FUSILLI project [H2020-FNR-2020-1/CE-FNR-07-2020] and the CIRAWA project [HORIZON-CL6-2022-FARM2FORK-01]. Consejería de Educación de la Junta de Castilla y León / Ministerio de Educación y Formación Profesional (MEFP): contrato predoctoral de Luisa Fernanda Lozano Castellanos 2025-07-29T09:10:39Z 2025-07-29T09:10:39Z 2025 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Food Bioscience, 2025, vol. 64, p. 105950 2212-4292 https://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/76938 10.1016/j.fbio.2025.105950 105950 Food Bioscience 64 eng https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212429225001269 Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional Atribución 4.0 Internacional info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ © 2025 The Author(s) application/pdf Elsevier https://uvadoc.uva.es/bitstream/10324/76938/4/Effects-different-types-artificial-light.pdf.jpg Hispana TEXT http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ UVaDOC. Repositorio Documental de la Universidad de Valladolid https://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/76938